Live data from Hacker News

Happy (?) 7 Billion Day

blog.infochimps.com

21–23 of 23 posts

Re: Happy (?) 7 Billion Day

#21

Death by warfare is on the decline, poverty globally is decreasing, affluence is increasing, technology is rapidly improving, communications are knitting together all cultures and regions of the world in ways we can't fully appreciate even while it's happening. Compared to even two decades ago there are millions upon millions of people who are no longer in poverty. There are countries who have become part of the deve…

In response to the deleted post below: I don't think it's fair, let alone possible, to try to prevent the developing world from becoming developed merely out of a fear for the possibility of "bad things" happening due to excess CO2 in the atmosphere. Moreover, we are already more or less past the stage where we will have to deal with the consequences of high CO2 levels, whatever they are. I think a wealthier, more developed world is far, far more likely to be able to do that.

Additionally, if it's possible for the developed world to switch to "green" energy sources economically then it ought to be possible for the developing world to do so as well.

Re: Happy (?) 7 Billion Day

#22
post #8

notice that ~ 2/3 of the world population is south asia. Dear god. Nigeria and Pakistan combined have the same population as the US. Europe is a statistical error number wise compared to everything else.

Europe has about 400m people, more than the US. It's Russia that's thinly populated for its size (because a lot of it is frozen).

You must be referring to the European Union rather than the European continent. As of 2011, EU is now more than 500 million people.

Re: Happy (?) 7 Billion Day

#23
post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Europe has about 400m people, more than the US. It's Russia that's thinly populated for its size (because a lot of it is frozen).

You must be referring to the European Union rather than the European continent. As of 2011, EU is now more than 500 million people.

My point is that even the narrowest measure of Europe's population amounts to rather more than 'a statistical error' as suggested above.
Post reply on HN