Apple Lossless Audio Codec is now open source (Apache license)
21–30 of 182 posts
Re: Apple Lossless Audio Codec is now open source (Apache license)
#22Re: Apple Lossless Audio Codec is now open source (Apache license)
#23What's the point of this over flac?
Re: Apple Lossless Audio Codec is now open source (Apache license)
#24I welcome this open sourcing because it makes my 'archival' format slightly less oddball.
Re: Apple Lossless Audio Codec is now open source (Apache license)
#25Someone came up with a reverse engineered decoder 6+ years ago: http://craz.net/programs/itunes/alac.html Nice to have an encoder now too.
Re: Apple Lossless Audio Codec is now open source (Apache license)
#26Re: Apple Lossless Audio Codec is now open source (Apache license)
#27Earlier quoted context omitted.
MP3 was great for its time. It’s not a crap format, there are merely better formats available today. They weren’t when MP3 came to the market. (Specifically AAC was developed as a successor to MP3.) I’m also not sure whether this tells you anything. Apple started selling AAC encoded music at a time when no† music player could play it. Many mistakenly thought that AAC was some sort of proprietary Apple codec and it mi…
Lossless music - there is an audience for it, and it creates the ability to stratify prices, which the labels/rights-holders/distributors like. See the vinyl boom, hdtracks.com, http://www.becausesoundmatters.com/ , etc. So will Apple cater to audiophiles? No. Will they cater to margins? For damned sure they will if it serves them and those they entice to sign over content. Why would they switch to 1080P otherwise? A…
Yeah, this kind of thinking is pervasive in the music industry which is why I make sure they never get any of my money. You're always paying for the licensing, not the delivery method (so they don't need to replace your CD at cost), unless they can make a buck by making you pay for that, in which case you are no longer paying for the license, but rather the delivery method.
As such I don't even know what the fuck I'd be paying for if I bought a song on iTunes or whatever else.
Re: Apple Lossless Audio Codec is now open source (Apache license)
#28What's the point of this over flac?
It plays on iPods and other iOS devices. Other than that, not much -- FLAC's compression ratio is a bit better on average, and more non-Apple devices support it. The release of this code isn't really all that exciting, as there's already a free reverse-engineered implementation in libav. (It might not support all the modes described in this source release, though.)
Re: Apple Lossless Audio Codec is now open source (Apache license)
#29Earlier quoted context omitted.
MP3 was great for its time. It’s not a crap format, there are merely better formats available today. They weren’t when MP3 came to the market. (Specifically AAC was developed as a successor to MP3.) I’m also not sure whether this tells you anything. Apple started selling AAC encoded music at a time when no† music player could play it. Many mistakenly thought that AAC was some sort of proprietary Apple codec and it mi…
Lossless music - there is an audience for it, and it creates the ability to stratify prices, which the labels/rights-holders/distributors like. See the vinyl boom, hdtracks.com, http://www.becausesoundmatters.com/ , etc. So will Apple cater to audiophiles? No. Will they cater to margins? For damned sure they will if it serves them and those they entice to sign over content. Why would they switch to 1080P otherwise? A…
Lossy formats are useless to me since I can't remix them without it sounding like crap. I also feel I'm getting ripped-off when they charge near CD price for lossy tracks.
Also, 20 years from now I'm going to want to convert my music to whatever fancy lossy codec has supplanted MP3 and AAC. By archiving in an open lossless format like FLAC (or now ALAC), I can do this without introducing artifacts.
Re: Apple Lossless Audio Codec is now open source (Apache license)
#30FINALLY!!! But what does this mean for the future of FLAC?