So, now we can't use Teams to have the "water-cooler" moments that supervisors claim we need, but really we are having them on Signal or IOS and they just can't measure that. Organizations really, really, really hate transparency.
Microsoft Purview: Additional classifiers for Communication Compliance (preview)
21–30 of 317 posts
Re: Microsoft Purview: Additional classifiers for Communication Compliance (preview)
#22Earlier quoted context omitted.
Lol depends what industry your in. Im a one man band msp so I literally set up these catch all employee tracking systems. Most folks don't realise they exist, even fewer use the data produced by the systems. Legit 90% of the time it's just kept in case of gov audit or something going pear shaped and we need proof it wasn't us. Trust is all well and good, but trust ain't gonna pass an audit or get you out of trouble i…
Small software companies doing innovative things. Any business area that might need an external audit is a severe red flag in this context. That also typically means it's less fun, IMO. A software company running a Microsoft-based email/etc system is also a red flag in this context. I mean, why...
Re: Microsoft Purview: Additional classifiers for Communication Compliance (preview)
#23If you've ever thought your employer isn't monitoring the chat then you're a fool. I'd go as far to say that if you think there is any form of electronic communication that isn't being monitored on some level you're also being foolish.
Re: Microsoft Purview: Additional classifiers for Communication Compliance (preview)
#24Re: Microsoft Purview: Additional classifiers for Communication Compliance (preview)
#25Earlier quoted context omitted.
Lol depends what industry your in. Im a one man band msp so I literally set up these catch all employee tracking systems. Most folks don't realise they exist, even fewer use the data produced by the systems. Legit 90% of the time it's just kept in case of gov audit or something going pear shaped and we need proof it wasn't us. Trust is all well and good, but trust ain't gonna pass an audit or get you out of trouble i…
> I literally set up these catch all employee tracking systems. Does that bother you at all? Not just about the employees you’re doing this to, but about being part of the system that normalises this kind of surveillance generally? Is this really the kind of world you want to live in?
Re: Microsoft Purview: Additional classifiers for Communication Compliance (preview)
#26Next step will be to detect potential attempt at unionizing.
They have "workplace collusion" as a category, and even more dystopian shit, like: EDIT: apparently these 2 are just jokes, sorry for not checking my sources! `Negative emotions: Expressions of sadness, unhappiness, discontent, anger, rage, anguish, or existential ennui, as these may negatively affect team cohesion. Joy: Language suggesting hopefulness, optimism, anticipation of a brighter future, faith in humankind…
Re: Microsoft Purview: Additional classifiers for Communication Compliance (preview)
#27You just installed it locally off a disc and it just worked when you needed it. You didn’t even need internet.
Re: Microsoft Purview: Additional classifiers for Communication Compliance (preview)
#28If you've ever thought your employer isn't monitoring the chat then you're a fool. I'd go as far to say that if you think there is any form of electronic communication that isn't being monitored on some level you're also being foolish.
Re: Microsoft Purview: Additional classifiers for Communication Compliance (preview)
#29Earlier quoted context omitted.
Small software companies doing innovative things. Any business area that might need an external audit is a severe red flag in this context. That also typically means it's less fun, IMO. A software company running a Microsoft-based email/etc system is also a red flag in this context. I mean, why...
All businesses require an audit of some kind. How do you think due diligence works?
How do you think reality works?
Re: Microsoft Purview: Additional classifiers for Communication Compliance (preview)
#30Earlier quoted context omitted.
Lol depends what industry your in. Im a one man band msp so I literally set up these catch all employee tracking systems. Most folks don't realise they exist, even fewer use the data produced by the systems. Legit 90% of the time it's just kept in case of gov audit or something going pear shaped and we need proof it wasn't us. Trust is all well and good, but trust ain't gonna pass an audit or get you out of trouble i…
Small software companies doing innovative things. Any business area that might need an external audit is a severe red flag in this context. That also typically means it's less fun, IMO. A software company running a Microsoft-based email/etc system is also a red flag in this context. I mean, why...