21–30 of 79 posts
In terms of their stock, the only reason to ever own a stock is the promise of future cash flow, and yeah they'll probably get there, but bleh.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
They’re just targeting people who think the ads aren’t a big deal. I know people making massive money who sit through Youtube and Hulu ads. I’m the only person I know who subscribed to Youtube premium it seems. So, plenty of people to target with ads. Even HNers making big bucks.
Ads are their own form of entertainment.
If I see one ad, I guarantee I cancel and download elsewhere.
If I see one ad, I guarantee I cancel and download elsewhere.
If I see one ad, I guarantee I cancel and download elsewhere.
Based on the content of the article, seems obvious they're adding ads to a new lower tier / free tier plan. This is what most if not all competitors do. I don't see the big deal, it's not like they're going to inject ads into the current tiers.
They will have a "limited ads" tier to replace "no ads" within 5 years.
People that have extra disposable income to avoid ads are very valuable to advertisers.
Based on the content of the article, seems obvious they're adding ads to a new lower tier / free tier plan. This is what most if not all competitors do. I don't see the big deal, it's not like they're going to inject ads into the current tiers.
> it's not like they're going to inject ads into the current tiers They will have a "limited ads" tier to replace "no ads" within 5 years. People that have extra disposable income to avoid ads are very valuable to advertisers.
So yeah, showing even a single ad is just the fire I need to remember to cancel.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> it's not like they're going to inject ads into the current tiers They will have a "limited ads" tier to replace "no ads" within 5 years. People that have extra disposable income to avoid ads are very valuable to advertisers.
If they do they are going to lose massively subscribers.
That's the funny thing about oligopoly, you know...