Earlier quoted context omitted.
We went through this with a relative recently. She needed a surgical operation. We were asked to either 1. Wait for prior authorization and allow our appointment to be canceled and rescheduled (for the fourth time, having already wasted several weeks) 2. Pay out of pocket We decided to pay out of pocket, since we knew that the prior authorization could delay us by an arbitrary amount of additional time and had recent…
> The twisted thing is that you can't just get the operation done and let the prior authorization work itself out later. It truly has to be prior or you get stuck paying out of pocket, even if the operation is obviously medically necessary. I have had doctors collect payment, and then refund me once they get paid by the MCO. One more thing that would help here is decoupling employers from your MCO. That way, when you…
While insurance tied to your employer sucks, I think the best thing to do here is for the law to iron out the data interchange between MCOs. In a "marketplace" like the US, insurers must be under a dire legal obligation to transfer your data in a comprehensive and timely fashion to whoever is currently administering payment for your care. Especially when lifesaving medication is involved.
The patient should not be held hostage by the incompetence of MCOs at communicating medical data.