Live data from Hacker News

There's an ARM Cortex-M4 with Bluetooth inside a Covid test kit

twitter.com

21–30 of 199 posts

Re: There's an ARM Cortex-M4 with Bluetooth inside a Covid test kit

#23
post #22

This is depressing. Single use disposable. Full of copper, gold, tungsten, halfnium. Will leach poison into the ground. Some of the most advanced technology of our age. Use it once, toss it in the trash. Meanwhile the paper versions work just fine.

The optics on this seem to indicate that it is just a lateral flow test of some kind.

It's not even different. Instead of having to interpret a couple lines you have software interpret the strip and tell you over bt on your phone. So much tech for so little.

Re: There's an ARM Cortex-M4 with Bluetooth inside a Covid test kit

#27
post #4

I worked at a company that was using these chips to control doors. They're extremely cheap chips, but writing code for them is not pleasant. Documentation is lacking and the tools people use to write code for it suck. Props to the devs who helped put this together.

Any chance I can reuse one of these boards given that I have a few of these test kits? Or are the tools so bad that it's not worth it?

Re: There's an ARM Cortex-M4 with Bluetooth inside a Covid test kit

#28
post #22

This is depressing. Single use disposable. Full of copper, gold, tungsten, halfnium. Will leach poison into the ground. Some of the most advanced technology of our age. Use it once, toss it in the trash. Meanwhile the paper versions work just fine.

If you read the full Twitter thread they explain that paper doesn’t work for everyone (the color blind and the incompetent, for example.) There is a use case, it just might not be for you.

Re: There's an ARM Cortex-M4 with Bluetooth inside a Covid test kit

#29
post #4

I worked at a company that was using these chips to control doors. They're extremely cheap chips, but writing code for them is not pleasant. Documentation is lacking and the tools people use to write code for it suck. Props to the devs who helped put this together.

> Documentation is lacking and the tools people use to write code for it suck.

Okay, I'm going to ask "Compared to whom?"

Nordic has been one of the better BLE chip manufacturers in terms of documentation, in my experience.

Most places use Keil tools directly from ARM. So, if programming these sucks, so does programming most embedded Cortex M4 chips. (No argument. Keil sucks. However, that doesn't mean that Nordic sucks any worse than anybody else).

And now you can program Nordic chips using Visual Studio Code.

Post reply on HN