Meanwhile IntelliJ is rotting with months-old bugs that render entire features useless, with no fixes and no ETAs in sight. The only product that I pay money for that constantly, on almost every release, pains me with new bugs, a good portion of which are never fixed. I thought about using other Jetbrains products like DataGrip (and now this Fleet), but I'm not going to invest even more into a company that simply ref…
IntelliJ IDEA along with the platform is the largest team at JetBrains and we're constantly working on bugs and features. If you can please point me to the issues you're referring to in YouTrack, I can check the status.
JetBrains Fleet: The Next-Generation IDE by JetBrains
21–30 of 169 posts
Re: JetBrains Fleet: The Next-Generation IDE by JetBrains
#22Re: JetBrains Fleet: The Next-Generation IDE by JetBrains
#23Re: JetBrains Fleet: The Next-Generation IDE by JetBrains
#24Re: JetBrains Fleet: The Next-Generation IDE by JetBrains
#25Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is the JVM portion still using Swing? And can you share any details about what you're using Rust for?
Briefly: no, it's a custom reactive UI framework similar to Jetpack Compose. Rust is used for native operations such as accessing file system, launching processes, etc
Re: JetBrains Fleet: The Next-Generation IDE by JetBrains
#26Earlier quoted context omitted.
I was reporting a lot of bugs to them initially, but so many of them were ignored that I can’t force myself to do this anymore. I’m still paying for IDEA Ultimate, but it's only because I’m waiting for a better IDE with a more fair subscription system (when I cancel the subscription that was at least 1 year long, I should have the LATEST version I’ve paid for, not the first one). I will try Feet, of course, but I hav…
Are these on YouTrack? Under same username as here?
Re: JetBrains Fleet: The Next-Generation IDE by JetBrains
#27Not that I am a particular fan of web based apps, however, there are very significant use cases involved like hosting a JetBrains powered editor in the web.
Re: JetBrains Fleet: The Next-Generation IDE by JetBrains
#28This was almost overdue. Since the beginning of Covid, the need for good remote code development raised quite a bit (at least for many people I know, including our team). When compared to VS Code and its remote editing over SSH, IntelliJ was really lacking. I know of a couple of people who went away from PyCharm just because of this.
Related reports: https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/PY-19752, https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/IDEA-226455
I tried Code With Me but this seems limited to 10 minutes in the free version or so, and also not really intended for remote editing but more for pair programming.
> hosted in Space
What does this mean? I have not really explored this so far. Can I host private own Space instances? I can imagine this would be a requirement in many environments.
Is Space an alternative to GitHub or other hosting solutions? We would not want to move our code, issues and internal project management over to some other platform. We just want good remote editing support.
Will there be a free community version of Fleet?
Anyway, I applied for an invitation to Fleet Preview. Maybe I can get a chance soon to try it out.
Re: JetBrains Fleet: The Next-Generation IDE by JetBrains
#29Meanwhile IntelliJ is rotting with months-old bugs that render entire features useless, with no fixes and no ETAs in sight. The only product that I pay money for that constantly, on almost every release, pains me with new bugs, a good portion of which are never fixed. I thought about using other Jetbrains products like DataGrip (and now this Fleet), but I'm not going to invest even more into a company that simply ref…
Re: JetBrains Fleet: The Next-Generation IDE by JetBrains
#30Earlier quoted context omitted.
Briefly: no, it's a custom reactive UI framework similar to Jetpack Compose. Rust is used for native operations such as accessing file system, launching processes, etc
Interesting that you would use Rust for those operations since the JVM was already presumably giving you cross-platform implementations. Was that a significant performance bottleneck that got alleviated by using Rust, or was there another reason?