As a recovering addict I’m quite mixed about legalisation. On one hand it helps out a lot of people and removes stigma around a form of indulgence. At the same time this is probably creating orders of magnitude more addicts. The adverse effects of a strong dependence can be severe: from people letting life blast past them without much realisation to lung/brain function/psychological disorders. I wish we could have a…
> probably creating orders of magnitude more addicts [citation needed]
Germany will legalize marijuana and promote drug harm reduction
21–30 of 94 posts
Re: Germany will legalize marijuana and promote drug harm reduction
#22Hope this won't lead to more smoking in public places. Every time I notice people consuming or having have had consumed the drug in some form, I found it even more insufferable than day-to-day cigarettes.
Re: Germany will legalize marijuana and promote drug harm reduction
#23Re: Germany will legalize marijuana and promote drug harm reduction
#24Re: Germany will legalize marijuana and promote drug harm reduction
#25Mostly off topic but when I read these stories I'm always irked at the use of "marijuana" instead of cannabis. Maybe because I'm in Toronto where cannabis is fully legal and every store around me that sells it uses cannabis - not to mention the products all use that term as well. Marijuana just seems like your using old, slightly racist terminology. And makes me think of 4/20 BLAZE IT kind of crap. Which is probably…
Marijuana is the dried leaves and flowers of the Cannabis sativa or Cannabis indica plant. I cannot imagine how the term is racist. But the fact thay it makes you think of 420, that’s just you.
It's definitely suspicious at least. If you really want you can view it as more cynically exploiting existing prejudice than prejudiced in and of itself, but I am not sure that is much of an exoneration.
Re: Germany will legalize marijuana and promote drug harm reduction
#26Earlier quoted context omitted.
> probably creating orders of magnitude more addicts [citation needed]
If there’s x% chance of addiction and the availability increases by few orders of magnitude wouldn’t it naturally follow?
There is precedent in various US states and a handful of countries.
Cost benefit analysis of what is actually happening in these places is a key motivator for the continued wave of legalization around the world.
This is much studied.
DYOR but here's a start:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drug_policy_of_Portugal
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=portugal+drug+policy&hl...
Also, I'm not sure if you literally mean "a few orders of magnitude" or are using that phrase to simply mean "an increase".
Re: Germany will legalize marijuana and promote drug harm reduction
#27Mostly off topic but when I read these stories I'm always irked at the use of "marijuana" instead of cannabis. Maybe because I'm in Toronto where cannabis is fully legal and every store around me that sells it uses cannabis - not to mention the products all use that term as well. Marijuana just seems like your using old, slightly racist terminology. And makes me think of 4/20 BLAZE IT kind of crap. Which is probably…
Re: Germany will legalize marijuana and promote drug harm reduction
#28Earlier quoted context omitted.
> probably creating orders of magnitude more addicts [citation needed]
If there’s x% chance of addiction and the availability increases by few orders of magnitude wouldn’t it naturally follow?
Re: Germany will legalize marijuana and promote drug harm reduction
#29Hope this won't lead to more smoking in public places. Every time I notice people consuming or having have had consumed the drug in some form, I found it even more insufferable than day-to-day cigarettes.
ok, I'll bite. Why is it worse, I mean "insufferable"? The whole point is not to be hunted for the horrible crime of smoking a joint. Is it any worse than drinking coffee or something? I think not but you obviously have your reservations.
Re: Germany will legalize marijuana and promote drug harm reduction
#30Earlier quoted context omitted.
> probably creating orders of magnitude more addicts [citation needed]
If there’s x% chance of addiction and the availability increases by few orders of magnitude wouldn’t it naturally follow?