Live data from Hacker News

Apple's early success stemmed from a tiny 20kb computer program they didn't make

stackbit.com

21–30 of 41 posts

Re: Apple's early success stemmed from a tiny 20kb computer program they didn't make

#21
post #2

That's a nice snippet of the original source code! Does anyone recognize the language? Googling tells me that VisiCalc was written in Apple II (6502) assembly, but this is clearly not that.

Looks like macro-heavy assembly to me. If one is not familiar with macro assemblers, in summary you could write your own language in macro assembler. And some did, which makes for a great debugging session if you're the one that has to fix it long after the original dev left. This page explains better than I ever will: https://www.tutorialspoint.com/assembly_programming/assembly...

OT: I had a research project many years ago (it feels strange that I can now call it "many") that was to translate a program into C. The original program was written in "FORCE", which was a macro language extension on top of Fortran that we no longer had a compiler for. It was absolutely fascinating.

Re: Apple's early success stemmed from a tiny 20kb computer program they didn't make

#22
post #19
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

disk = an obsolete long-term storage medium, in case anyone was wondering

storage medium = what people used before we all ascended to the cloud, in case anyone was wondering

wondering = what we used to do before the internet, if anyone was curious

Re: Apple's early success stemmed from a tiny 20kb computer program they didn't make

#23

The headline on the article (and the tag, from what I can see) is "The 20KB Computer Program That Changed The World"; the title used here seems like it's deliberately reaching for an anti-Apple spin. I mean, WordPerfect absolutely sold hundreds of thousands of DOS computers, but "Microsoft's early success stemmed from a [insert size of WordPerfect] program they didn't make" would...raise eyebrows, wouldn't it?

Yes, the title is clickbait. But there has been endless snide commentary over the past 4-5 decades about Excel and Word being ripoffs of other companies' inventions. Hell, Microsoft famously didn't develop MS-DOS !

True, true. (Although I'm not sure if Excel and Word are ripoffs except to the degree that word processors and spreadsheets already existed.)

Re: Apple's early success stemmed from a tiny 20kb computer program they didn't make

#24
post #5

This is crazy petty, I know, but the article starts with “You’ve never heard of Dan or Bob. But you should have.” I mean, I do know about VisiCalc. But even if I didn’t, don’t try to shame me for it — learning is awesome. This kind of negging from a blog post always makes me dismiss it as linkbait even when the subject matter (as with this piece) is actually pretty good.

Dan Bricklin was at some local tech event I was at several years back. I sort of recognized him, but had to surreptitiously check his name badge to be sure. Being old, I [sort of] knew who he was but figured most of the folks in our circle wouldn’t.

Intending to honor him, I dropped a line about how smart the team who created Lotus 1-2-3 must have been. Needless to say, Dan was not as amused/honored at my reference as I’d intended (had I gotten his product correct).

Re: Apple's early success stemmed from a tiny 20kb computer program they didn't make

#25
post #5

This is crazy petty, I know, but the article starts with “You’ve never heard of Dan or Bob. But you should have.” I mean, I do know about VisiCalc. But even if I didn’t, don’t try to shame me for it — learning is awesome. This kind of negging from a blog post always makes me dismiss it as linkbait even when the subject matter (as with this piece) is actually pretty good.

Seems like you took that pretty personally. I would interpret it as they have not been given the notoriety they deserve based on their impact.

Re: Apple's early success stemmed from a tiny 20kb computer program they didn't make

#26
post #17

Great example that good software is more important than good hardware. The best hardware will not sell if the user experience is poor due to bad software. The opposite is much easier. As long as the software works reasonably well, customers are more likely to overlook problems in the hardware. That's why there are still so many crappy Windows laptops. The screen is bad, the keyboard is creaky, and the display is from…

Software vs hardware: there's an urban legend that when this came out, accountants would walk into electronics stores and say "I want to buy a Visicalc!"

Re: Apple's early success stemmed from a tiny 20kb computer program they didn't make

#27
post #20

Really the entire personal computer industry's early success was due to VisiCalc, followed by Lotus 1-2-3. Likewise for WordStar, then WordPerfect. It was the first thing I ever heard referred to in the press as a "killer app", which I think of every time someone here makes the claim that nobody called applications "apps" before the iOS App Store.

There's some nuance there though, "killer app" is sometimes short for "application" in the sense of "use" not "program"[1]. When Steve Jobs said "the killer app is making calls." in the iPhone intro, he wasn't talking about the dialer app.

1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Killer_application#Usage

Re: Apple's early success stemmed from a tiny 20kb computer program they didn't make

#29
post #26
post #17

Great example that good software is more important than good hardware. The best hardware will not sell if the user experience is poor due to bad software. The opposite is much easier. As long as the software works reasonably well, customers are more likely to overlook problems in the hardware. That's why there are still so many crappy Windows laptops. The screen is bad, the keyboard is creaky, and the display is from…

Software vs hardware: there's an urban legend that when this came out, accountants would walk into electronics stores and say "I want to buy a Visicalc!"

Well, they kinda did buy Visicalc. It's just that the dongle was kinda big and expensive...

Re: Apple's early success stemmed from a tiny 20kb computer program they didn't make

#30

The headline on the article (and the tag, from what I can see) is "The 20KB Computer Program That Changed The World"; the title used here seems like it's deliberately reaching for an anti-Apple spin. I mean, WordPerfect absolutely sold hundreds of thousands of DOS computers, but "Microsoft's early success stemmed from a [insert size of WordPerfect] program they didn't make" would...raise eyebrows, wouldn't it?

I wonder what the amount of manpower is today, outside of Apple, that boosts Apple sales.

Are there more people working "for" Apple than there are people working for Apple?

Post reply on HN