Back then we were moving a terabyte a week on one Hotline Server alone. Napster was already way way more popular (and accessible).
Napster.com banned at some universities for clogging networks (2000)
21–30 of 189 posts
Re: Napster.com banned at some universities for clogging networks (2000)
#22Yes piracy is bad and all but as a college student, Napster was such as life saver. You could literally download any song you wanted to listen to. I also remember another application called Kazaa that was popular as well (circa 2000-2002ish)
Re: Napster.com banned at some universities for clogging networks (2000)
#23There was something about piracy in the times of Napster, emule and the like. It really made you feel like you knew some incantation to get access to the whole world's information. In practical terms, I have access to far more content now (music on Spotify, shows and movies on streaming services, tutorials, online classes, etc) and yet our reach doesn't seem as wide as it seemed in those times. Perhaps it was just th…
Re: Napster.com banned at some universities for clogging networks (2000)
#24Those were glorious days. To go from buying CDs to being able to find and download almost any song you could think of was amazing. I loved the ability to discover artists I didn’t know about by looking through people’s collections. Such a great discovery feature. It was all illegal, but it just an amazing time.
Re: Napster.com banned at some universities for clogging networks (2000)
#25There was something about piracy in the times of Napster, emule and the like. It really made you feel like you knew some incantation to get access to the whole world's information. In practical terms, I have access to far more content now (music on Spotify, shows and movies on streaming services, tutorials, online classes, etc) and yet our reach doesn't seem as wide as it seemed in those times. Perhaps it was just th…
It's a bit of legwork and both legally and ethically questionable, but a modern usenet|(radarr||sonarr)|nzbget|jellyfin pipeline makes the legal providers seem obscenely limited.
It doesn't matter who has negotiated what license with whom -- if I want to watch a bit of media, I can usually do so in high quality with a few clicks and a few minutes wait. (rarely more than 30 minutes for the 4k good stuff)
Re: Napster.com banned at some universities for clogging networks (2000)
#26Napster is one of the two or three products that spawned a completely different world, entirely tossing established and antiquated rules on their head. Of course, very directly, Spotify would not exist without Napster. But a step further, it opened the eyes to end-users about their collective power, and the beauty of distributed distribution. It was the first proof that "regular" users would buy into such a thing. Na…
Evidence: https://www.visualcapitalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/...
Re: Napster.com banned at some universities for clogging networks (2000)
#27Those were glorious days. To go from buying CDs to being able to find and download almost any song you could think of was amazing. I loved the ability to discover artists I didn’t know about by looking through people’s collections. Such a great discovery feature. It was all illegal, but it just an amazing time.
Re: Napster.com banned at some universities for clogging networks (2000)
#28There was something about piracy in the times of Napster, emule and the like. It really made you feel like you knew some incantation to get access to the whole world's information. In practical terms, I have access to far more content now (music on Spotify, shows and movies on streaming services, tutorials, online classes, etc) and yet our reach doesn't seem as wide as it seemed in those times. Perhaps it was just th…
Napster had some bootleg content that would be illegal on modern streaming services.
There are a couple of times when it has been totally deleted though (Universal Studios Japan deleting Monoeyes songs), so that's why I prefer not to use my personal Google account for sharing content - losing access to GMail as a result of sharing something on YouTube is not a risk I'd like to take.
I wish there were a way to bulk-upload music (from, say, the 1.3 TB MySpace Dragon Hoard), but personal accounts are limited to 50 songs per day.
Re: Napster.com banned at some universities for clogging networks (2000)
#29Yes piracy is bad and all but as a college student, Napster was such as life saver. You could literally download any song you wanted to listen to. I also remember another application called Kazaa that was popular as well (circa 2000-2002ish)
Re: Napster.com banned at some universities for clogging networks (2000)
#30There was something about piracy in the times of Napster, emule and the like. It really made you feel like you knew some incantation to get access to the whole world's information. In practical terms, I have access to far more content now (music on Spotify, shows and movies on streaming services, tutorials, online classes, etc) and yet our reach doesn't seem as wide as it seemed in those times. Perhaps it was just th…
because you don't actually "have" the files.