First it was big oil, then it was shortsellers, but I found those narratives sort of died out.
Who are they beefing with right now?
21–30 of 455 posts
First it was big oil, then it was shortsellers, but I found those narratives sort of died out.
Who are they beefing with right now?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Watch again. Those pedestrians were in the crosswalk before the car turns. That's illegal at best , and definitely dangerous for those pedestrians. The car wasn't taking a tight right turn either.
Haha how is that illegal? The driver took over way before the car entered the crosswalk section.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Watch again. Those pedestrians were in the crosswalk before the car turns. That's illegal at best , and definitely dangerous for those pedestrians. The car wasn't taking a tight right turn either.
Haha how is that illegal? The driver took over way before the car entered the crosswalk section.
"Almost hitting pedestrians" isn't how I'd describe what I saw in the video.
Ok, I’ll ask. How would you describe it?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Watch again. Those pedestrians were in the crosswalk before the car turns. That's illegal at best , and definitely dangerous for those pedestrians. The car wasn't taking a tight right turn either.
Haha how is that illegal? The driver took over way before the car entered the crosswalk section.
But if you were an observer on the corner and could not see whether it was a human or an AI was driving the car, you would almost certainly consider whatever the car did (starting the turn) while pedestrians were actively crossing dangerous.
"Almost hitting pedestrians" isn't how I'd describe what I saw in the video.
Watch again. Those pedestrians were in the crosswalk before the car turns. That's illegal at best , and definitely dangerous for those pedestrians. The car wasn't taking a tight right turn either.
It wasn't even close. Look at where the ped is at 12 seconds, compared to the car. It's because he stopped the turn, and straightened the vehicle that the pedestrian stopped and looked up with concern (at 13 seconds). Even if the pedestrian broke out into a full run, they wouldn't have been in any real danger.
This sort of close interplay between pedestrians and cars is very common in cities.
The concern I have is that the "eye contact" element is lost. When in doubt of another motorists intentions, we make eye contact and look for acknowledgement or an indication of intent. This doesn't exist with FSD.
Edit: Some people have pointed out the car wasn't supposed to be turning right which I missed. If that's the case, the situation and my opinion is completely different.