Live data from Hacker News

More than 75% of Job Posts are Remote

remoteclan.com

21–30 of 64 posts

Re: More than 75% of Job Posts are Remote

#21
post #2

I also would not be surprised if more American jobs are now hiring people on as contractors only, without the benefits.

Are they offering rates that offset the cost of that stuff? Most contracts I see absolutely suck because they just offer what an equivalent full time roles would with an additional tax burden.

Re: More than 75% of Job Posts are Remote

#22
post #14

Has anyone seen if there's a clear path to working from an overseas location. I have an LLC if that works, I figure I could do a Corp to Corp as long as LLC exists within the US.

The safest and most straight forward is to use an umbrella company. I have friends who work for SV companies (they actually relocated from SV to overseas) in both Europe and Japan. This was the solution they chose and it works. The overhead costs are less than what the employer would usually pay for US payroll and health insurance, so the deal basically worked out that their foreign pre-tax salary through the umbrella company is what it was back in California.

Re: More than 75% of Job Posts are Remote

#23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I’m seeing is a lot for software development job postings in Canada. It is “remote” but you are required to live in the city.

Yes a lot of jobs in Canada that are "remote for now"; sometimes made explicit, other times implicit. Also an uptick in American companies attempting to hire remote from Canada, which is potentially good, except that I doubt many of them actually have the infrastructure (payroll, benefits, etc.) for doing the hire, so it's either contract, or it never actually happens.

For some international contractors this can be a nice pay bump, but I wonder if it's just hay fire and in a few months time companies realize that keeping a remote team functional requires work and they decide to just roll back. Time will tell.

Re: More than 75% of Job Posts are Remote

#24

most of the stuff I've seen is "temporarily remote" until COVID is over, so there is still an expectation that you will eventually come in. Who knows if that will ever happen, but it is quite a different situation between the two.

I’ve been coaching folks on jumping to new jobs for the last several months (helping others level up is my jam). In all cases, when I’ve told them to have the employer put the remote terms in their offer letter (if it’s not in writing it doesn’t exist), it has been done. Most of the time it’s painless, the few times the candidates have been told no I suggested they walk and the company capitulated in under 12 hours a…

That's quite timely advice. That's a very good point.

Re: More than 75% of Job Posts are Remote

#25
post #2

I also would not be surprised if more American jobs are now hiring people on as contractors only, without the benefits.

Benefits are just an appealing name given to anything an employer chooses to spend money on instead of paying you that money (and the trade typically works in their favor). Certainly, there are cases where contract employment is offered with pay that does not compete well against full-time employment/salary plus benefits, but that is not always the case. Anecdotally, I've seen contracts done as W2 with benefits, even…

Benefits are usually tax advantaged in some way, so it costs the company less to pay for my healthcare than to pay me sufficient cash to pay for my healthcare.

Re: More than 75% of Job Posts are Remote

#26
post #2

I also would not be surprised if more American jobs are now hiring people on as contractors only, without the benefits.

This could actually be an interesting path to get out of the "employer sponsored health care" mess that we have now. Pay people a bit more and create a bigger incentive for carriers to offer interesting plans to individuals.

Re: More than 75% of Job Posts are Remote

#27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Benefits are just an appealing name given to anything an employer chooses to spend money on instead of paying you that money (and the trade typically works in their favor). Certainly, there are cases where contract employment is offered with pay that does not compete well against full-time employment/salary plus benefits, but that is not always the case. Anecdotally, I've seen contracts done as W2 with benefits, even…

>Benefits are just an appealing name given to anything an employer chooses to spend money on instead of paying you that money (and the trade typically works in their favor). Nominally, this works out for both employer and employee, since those benefits can be paid for with pre tax money. Really, it gives big businesses an advantage over small businesses that cannot afford the costs to administer these benefits or the…

> those benefits can be paid for with pre tax money

The standard deduction largely gobbled up this scenario - paying towards health insurance premiums is tax deductible, but unless you can itemize beyond that standard deduction, it no longer matters. So in that case, yes there's somewhat of an advantage. Overall it can lead to complicated math trying to determine which scenario (W2 or 1099) will leave you with the most money/benefits.

And yes - with things like pooling resources, big business can often get better negotiated healthcare premiums than small business, let alone individuals.

For couples, it just varies by situation. Sometimes the W-2 member of the couple can get family health insurance, if that's a better deal than what the 1099 can get. If that's not an option, then yes, the 1099 member has to fend for themselves and buy an individual health insurance plan.

Re: More than 75% of Job Posts are Remote

#28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes a lot of jobs in Canada that are "remote for now"; sometimes made explicit, other times implicit. Also an uptick in American companies attempting to hire remote from Canada, which is potentially good, except that I doubt many of them actually have the infrastructure (payroll, benefits, etc.) for doing the hire, so it's either contract, or it never actually happens.

For some international contractors this can be a nice pay bump, but I wonder if it's just hay fire and in a few months time companies realize that keeping a remote team functional requires work and they decide to just roll back. Time will tell.

My company has a intriguing combo of mandatory office with most teams being distributed.

So you are guaranteed a remote work environment from an open office.

I really don’t think that will work long term, so can see a lot of restructuring.

Re: More than 75% of Job Posts are Remote

#30

most of the stuff I've seen is "temporarily remote" until COVID is over, so there is still an expectation that you will eventually come in. Who knows if that will ever happen, but it is quite a different situation between the two.

Remote is definitely a spectrum. On one end there's "you can be anywhere on the planet" to "you can work from home but we expect you to live in this city or state."

Employers know that remote is appealing to devs, so they're eager to claim they're remote employers. As folks elsewhere have said, read the fine print and get commitments in writing if needed.

Post reply on HN