Earlier quoted context omitted.
> but the whole point of the audit is to figure out what's true In the dictionary definition, yes. But the problem with this "audit" is filled with such corrupt cast of characters that their results can not be trusted. Sadly they're abusing the name of the process to be able to claim that their results will be authoritive. > If the audit has no basis in reality, as many claim, then it will fail. And who determines th…
I don't know anything about this audit other than that someone is doing some kind of audit in Arizona regarding the 2020 U.S. election. Can you please clarify what you mean by people involved being untrustworthy, and/or other arguments against this process? I honestly fail to see any problem with auditing election results, since as far as I know there is no actual remedy regardless of the results, and it seems to me…
> The “forensic audit,” as Senate GOP leaders are calling their review, is overseen by Cyber Ninjas, a small computer security firm with no election experience before Trump began questioning the 2020 results. Its CEO, Doug Logan, spread false conspiracy theories about the election before he was hired to lead the Arizona review.
https://apnews.com/article/technology-joe-biden-arizona-gove...