Disinformation: It’s History
21–30 of 57 posts
Re: Disinformation: It’s History
#22Re: Disinformation: It’s History
#23Nihilism makes me believe that Trump was not such abnormal occurrence. Human minds have a innate desire for virtue and truth, and since objectivity doesn't exist, it becomes difficult to admit that voters would end up create an alternative truth, or at least not at this scale. I think it always came from the fact that truth doesn't really exist. Humans can really believe anything. There is no good and no evil. In a w…
Claiming truth doesn't exist as fact is a truthy statement. Claiming objectivity doesn't exist is a contradiction.
Re: Disinformation: It’s History
#24There's that famous quote from Orwell- "Who controls the past controls the future; who controls the present controls the past."
Re: Disinformation: It’s History
#25And here I thought the author was making a pithy observation about the fact that history is always written by the victors, and therefor almost always a form of disinformation about the losers.
That would be "History: It's Disinformation".
edit: covered in the comments elsewhere, i see!
Re: Disinformation: It’s History
#26Re: Disinformation: It’s History
#27There's that famous quote from Orwell- "Who controls the past controls the future; who controls the present controls the past."
Re: Disinformation: It’s History
#28Earlier quoted context omitted.
Claiming truth doesn't exist as fact is a truthy statement. Claiming objectivity doesn't exist is a contradiction.
Pure objectivity doesn't really exist.
Re: Disinformation: It’s History
#29Nihilism makes me believe that Trump was not such abnormal occurrence. Human minds have a innate desire for virtue and truth, and since objectivity doesn't exist, it becomes difficult to admit that voters would end up create an alternative truth, or at least not at this scale. I think it always came from the fact that truth doesn't really exist. Humans can really believe anything. There is no good and no evil. In a w…
This is a great comment. People can believe anything. As a current example, in the United States the Republican party has been against vaccines. And have been telling their base to doubt them or not get them. Fox news has lead the way along with lots of other media channels. But for some reason they changed this week and started claiming everyone needs a vaccine. So the complete opposite story. And no one batted an e…
Citation needed! Pretty sure you do not have an accurate bead on how "everyone" reacted.
My guess? When people read their trusted news source, and it disagrees with a previous assertion that they've bought into? "Ugh stupid opponents are infiltrating our news. No way I'm buying into this government bullshit trying to force vaccines on us!"
(But I hope that what you say is right - that conservative news is finally encouraging vaccines... and maybe in a few weeks/months their audience will subconsciously flip to "oh yeah vaccines are good. I've always been planning to get them but I needed some assurance they are safe, which we're finally getting just now.")