> unauthorized persons can not get there for reasons I will not show Not sure what else can be there, I mean it's already a critical infrastructure of the plane what we saw
Funny how it reads like he's keeping the reasons secret.
The reasons are bloody obvious, who would want strangers poking around the blinkenlights.
I think it’s because anyway there is space under the cockpit and that’s structural. So there is no reason nor incentives to make those machines smaller while sacrificing fixability.
It’s either that or seats or kerosene. There is not enough room for seats, and it’s not an acceptable place to store kerosene (too dangerous in case of crash and can cause stability issues as the volume of kerosene decreases while flying).
Even assuming quadruple redundancy, seven nines uptime and resilience to extreme conditions and cosmic rays, this looks way way bigger than it should be.
One explanation could be that the certification process for anything aviation related is so expensive and slow that we're actually looking at tech from 15+ years ago.
Later in the video at 4:48 approx he demonstrates the nav computer GUI in the cockpit and I cringed when he used the touchscreen and there was a lag of about 2-5 (!) seconds after every interaction. My... god.... I kind of almost heard the mechanical drive seeking and reading and searching the heavily fragmented map data...
Probably because it is 10 year old older hardware but thoroughly tested. Using Chrome/JS/CSS on the latest Ryzen might be neat but when you need to transport 300 passengers daily around there is other sort of concerns then taking up 3 folks to the ISS every 6 months.
It was certified as testes, so the lag has been there for the whole 10 years.
In related news (same aicraft type involved), Airbus is working with their existing A350 customer Cathay Pacific to explore single pilot operations while in high altitude cruise.
So the next breed of terrorists will likely be those who’ll take over the flight avionics while on the plane? Laptops to be banned soon
How would you plug your Macbook into the plane's network?
You say that, but I'm always astounded when they talk about cyberterrorists being able to get into the power networks and similar bits of national infrastructure which really shouldn't be connected to the public Internet at all.
The entertainment electronics are in the headrests so that the kids behind you can regularly hit your headrest for your convenience.
I believe there are also some boxes under every other seat row that hold the small servers and disks for the thin clients in the headrest.
I'm truly mindblown because of such a waste of luggage space, of general space, and of electronics. In recent years airlines have started to charge even for the small handbag fitted under the seat, while packing even more obsolete eletronics into it. I guess the lobbying of copyright, media, and entertainment industries simply prevails everything including reason and safety.
> unauthorized persons can not get there for reasons I will not show Not sure what else can be there, I mean it's already a critical infrastructure of the plane what we saw
He probably means there is some intrusion prevention mechanism that keeps people out.