Abolish patents. This is worth a read: The Case Against Patents http://research.stlouisfed.org/wp/2012/2012-035.pdf/
That paper seems to focus entirely on tech.
21–30 of 38 posts
Abolish patents. This is worth a read: The Case Against Patents http://research.stlouisfed.org/wp/2012/2012-035.pdf/
That paper seems to focus entirely on tech.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
No. Lets take the most extreme example. Medicine. Development and clinical trials cost you more than a billion. Why would I risk this? I let you develop it, I let you do the clinical trials and then just copy it. Even better. I can always sell cheaper than you since I don't have to recover investment costs. The patents are the only incentives for the investors to accept the risk.
> Why would I risk this? Because you don't. Most of the medical research in the world is government sponsored (yes, including USA).
Central planners spending other people’s money cannot possibly compete with the private system.
Time to get rid of patents. Only useful to trolls and other anti-competitive elements
Dude. I just submitted two patents. Patents are the only way a small company can get an edge. And yes, there is more than software and IT in this world. Good luck to raise non IT capital in tech without patents.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Why would I risk this? Because you don't. Most of the medical research in the world is government sponsored (yes, including USA).
My wife has worked for a series of VC funded immunotherapy startups. No government money funding them. If there were no biotech patents it’s hard for me to see why anyone would invest hundreds of millions into these tiny companies. The money doesn’t go to salaries - it goes to equipment, supplies, and trials. Central planners spending other people’s money cannot possibly compete with the private system.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
My wife has worked for a series of VC funded immunotherapy startups. No government money funding them. If there were no biotech patents it’s hard for me to see why anyone would invest hundreds of millions into these tiny companies. The money doesn’t go to salaries - it goes to equipment, supplies, and trials. Central planners spending other people’s money cannot possibly compete with the private system.
Your example is anecdotal, while search shows that most of the medical research is gov money via universities.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
My wife has worked for a series of VC funded immunotherapy startups. No government money funding them. If there were no biotech patents it’s hard for me to see why anyone would invest hundreds of millions into these tiny companies. The money doesn’t go to salaries - it goes to equipment, supplies, and trials. Central planners spending other people’s money cannot possibly compete with the private system.
Your example is anecdotal, while search shows that most of the medical research is gov money via universities.
Abolish patents. This is worth a read: The Case Against Patents http://research.stlouisfed.org/wp/2012/2012-035.pdf/
Filings do not equal patents. China floods the market with scientific papers and only a very tiny percentile actually have anything useful. China is obsessed with publishing. I’ve often wondered if it’s for prestige or survival.