Heartened to see Taleb taking a skeptical stance on Bitcoin and crypto - last time I looked into it he was a proponent due to its decentralization and existence outside the monoculture of mainstream finance. The sooner we can move past these staggeringly inefficient environment-destroying pump-and-dump schemes the better off we'll all be.
Something can be overvalued without being worthless. Also, the environment argument is inconclusive. Using a lot of power isn't the problem, it is how the power was generated and whether or not it was excess capacity
Taleb: Bitcoin, Currencies, and Bubbles
21–30 of 84 posts
Re: Taleb: Bitcoin, Currencies, and Bubbles
#22Perhaps because we have a sample bias towards people who are served adequately by traditional financial infrastructure, and people who are disproportionately preoccupied with blockchain as a potential component of software systems.
As an example, most kids in starting school today will probably have years of experience being their own banker, using apps on their phones, before they ever step foot in place which employs bankers. At that point they may not bother, since the cryptocurrency ecosystem will already provide all the same facilities. This is profoundly disruptive.
Re: Taleb: Bitcoin, Currencies, and Bubbles
#23I’m pleased that Taleb doesn’t want to own bitcoin. He’s a millionaire already, and he already has a bank account for a long time, and enjoyed US dominance for all his life. Meanwhile finally El Salvadorian US immigrants will able to pay the rent and food for their parents stuck in El Salvador without a 20% markup 3 months for now.
I understand the money transfer problem. Cryptocurrency seems like a good idea in that case. I question though why choose Bitcoin? I guess a lot of people support it. But it is far from stable, so no one in the right mind, especially poor people should hold significant Bitcoins because it is speculative rather than stable. I guess stable coins do not have the wide acceptance that bitcoin has? Why not USDC or similar…
Re: Taleb: Bitcoin, Currencies, and Bubbles
#24Heartened to see Taleb taking a skeptical stance on Bitcoin and crypto - last time I looked into it he was a proponent due to its decentralization and existence outside the monoculture of mainstream finance. The sooner we can move past these staggeringly inefficient environment-destroying pump-and-dump schemes the better off we'll all be.
Something can be overvalued without being worthless. Also, the environment argument is inconclusive. Using a lot of power isn't the problem, it is how the power was generated and whether or not it was excess capacity
Coal and no, because that's the marginal production mode in China.
Re: Taleb: Bitcoin, Currencies, and Bubbles
#25I’m pleased that Taleb doesn’t want to own bitcoin. He’s a millionaire already, and he already has a bank account for a long time, and enjoyed US dominance for all his life. Meanwhile finally El Salvadorian US immigrants will able to pay the rent and food for their parents stuck in El Salvador without a 20% markup 3 months for now.
I understand the money transfer problem. Cryptocurrency seems like a good idea in that case. I question though why choose Bitcoin? I guess a lot of people support it. But it is far from stable, so no one in the right mind, especially poor people should hold significant Bitcoins because it is speculative rather than stable. I guess stable coins do not have the wide acceptance that bitcoin has? Why not USDC or similar…
Re: Taleb: Bitcoin, Currencies, and Bubbles
#26There seems to be a real under-appreciation by the Hacker News crowd of how profound the use case of cryptocurrencies as simple money is. Perhaps because we have a sample bias towards people who are served adequately by traditional financial infrastructure, and people who are disproportionately preoccupied with blockchain as a potential component of software systems. As an example, most kids in starting school today…
Re: Taleb: Bitcoin, Currencies, and Bubbles
#27There seems to be a real under-appreciation by the Hacker News crowd of how profound the use case of cryptocurrencies as simple money is. Perhaps because we have a sample bias towards people who are served adequately by traditional financial infrastructure, and people who are disproportionately preoccupied with blockchain as a potential component of software systems. As an example, most kids in starting school today…
For example, the disruptive experience you describe happens to statistically nobody. The kids you describe are not being their own bankers - almost all of them are using credit card-backed apps, and even if you only look at the few who use cryptocurrencies at all there’s a very small percentage who aren’t reliant on exchanges which are banks for all intents and purposes.
Re: Taleb: Bitcoin, Currencies, and Bubbles
#28Earlier quoted context omitted.
Peter McCormack could start by providing evidence for why the paper was wrong, instead was trying to bait Taleb into a Twitter thread that would have done no good to anyone. Good thing for Taleb that he didn't engage.
He did engage by calling him a "fucking idiot"
Re: Taleb: Bitcoin, Currencies, and Bubbles
#29I’m pleased that Taleb doesn’t want to own bitcoin. He’s a millionaire already, and he already has a bank account for a long time, and enjoyed US dominance for all his life. Meanwhile finally El Salvadorian US immigrants will able to pay the rent and food for their parents stuck in El Salvador without a 20% markup 3 months for now.
I understand the money transfer problem. Cryptocurrency seems like a good idea in that case. I question though why choose Bitcoin? I guess a lot of people support it. But it is far from stable, so no one in the right mind, especially poor people should hold significant Bitcoins because it is speculative rather than stable. I guess stable coins do not have the wide acceptance that bitcoin has? Why not USDC or similar…
People El Salvador didn't get the $1200 checks that US citizens got from printing more USD, even though they both use USD in theory. The president tried to get a deal with the IMF, but they couldn't agree on the terms, so he decided to give a choice to the people between a safe but inflating currency and a volatile / experimental but deflating currency.
Luckily there are enough market makers in both countries that transferring USD and recieving USD through the Bitcoin / Lightning network is cheaper and faster than using the traditional banking infrastructure.
I have a girlfriend in Colombia, and in addition to the 10% remittance fee she always has to go to the city from her village (1 hour bus ride) just to get money. I wish I could just send her money through Lightning network (she has internet + iPhone, so installing an app is not a problem).
Re: Taleb: Bitcoin, Currencies, and Bubbles
#30There seems to be a real under-appreciation by the Hacker News crowd of how profound the use case of cryptocurrencies as simple money is. Perhaps because we have a sample bias towards people who are served adequately by traditional financial infrastructure, and people who are disproportionately preoccupied with blockchain as a potential component of software systems. As an example, most kids in starting school today…
Here's a contemporary example: We can, right now, hold USD equivalents in kava.io . It operates on a system which is analogous to fractional reserve banking, except with no middlemen, so your effective interest rate is better by an order of magnitude. It's relatively simple to use. Giving a bank your trust a and a big cut of your returns is going to be a hard sell when that's your normal as a kid.