Live data from Hacker News

A case against text protocols

unmdplyr-new.bearblog.dev

21–23 of 23 posts

Re: A case against text protocols

#21
post #2

Back when HTTP and SMTP were designed, the Internet was mostly old Unix machines talking to each other. Everything was a file full of `char`, piped to an 80-column terminal. Text-based made sense. Decades later, when the computer world was bigger, faster, and more unified, other systems kind of cargo-culted off of those earlier successes. And isn't it neat that you can telnet into port 80? I think another big reason…

[deleted]

Re: A case against text protocols

#22
post #2

Back when HTTP and SMTP were designed, the Internet was mostly old Unix machines talking to each other. Everything was a file full of `char`, piped to an 80-column terminal. Text-based made sense. Decades later, when the computer world was bigger, faster, and more unified, other systems kind of cargo-culted off of those earlier successes. And isn't it neat that you can telnet into port 80? I think another big reason…

[deleted]

Re: A case against text protocols

#23
post #2

Back when HTTP and SMTP were designed, the Internet was mostly old Unix machines talking to each other. Everything was a file full of `char`, piped to an 80-column terminal. Text-based made sense. Decades later, when the computer world was bigger, faster, and more unified, other systems kind of cargo-culted off of those earlier successes. And isn't it neat that you can telnet into port 80? I think another big reason…

[deleted]
Post reply on HN