Live data from Hacker News

How Facebook deals with PCIe faults to keep its data centers running reliably

engineering.fb.com

21–30 of 53 posts

Re: How Facebook deals with PCIe faults to keep its data centers running reliably

#24
post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I believe this is called "technical marketing" Does Facebook still want to launch an own AWS clone?

Not sure if they did who would end up being the bigger asshole. My opinion of AWS is already at an all time low, but my opinion of Facebook has always been low too. At least it would introduce some competition for AWS.

Some competition for AWS? Seems like Azure and GCP are competing pretty hard don't you think?

Re: How Facebook deals with PCIe faults to keep its data centers running reliably

#25
post #24

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not sure if they did who would end up being the bigger asshole. My opinion of AWS is already at an all time low, but my opinion of Facebook has always been low too. At least it would introduce some competition for AWS.

Some competition for AWS? Seems like Azure and GCP are competing pretty hard don't you think?

I know many people who won't dare touch GCP with a ten foot pole simply because they're afraid of Google's random banning AI wiping their digital lives.

Azure is a minefield that's only worth it when on a .NET stack.

Re: How Facebook deals with PCIe faults to keep its data centers running reliably

#26

Sucks that I have to worry while reading their technical blog post that it's pretty likely that Facebook is tracking the fact that I'm reading their article.

Ah yes, because no other company puts analytics on their blog

Re: How Facebook deals with PCIe faults to keep its data centers running reliably

#27
> also important to rate-limit remediations and repairs as a safety net to prevent bugs in the code from mass draining and unprovisioning, which can result in service outages if not handled properly.

This is the most important bit for someone reimplementing this...

Never let automation 'run wild' - always have a maximum number of machines per second it can act on, and a maximum percentage of the fleet unhealthy to allow it to continue taking things out of service.

Re: How Facebook deals with PCIe faults to keep its data centers running reliably

#28
post #24

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Some competition for AWS? Seems like Azure and GCP are competing pretty hard don't you think?

I know many people who won't dare touch GCP with a ten foot pole simply because they're afraid of Google's random banning AI wiping their digital lives. Azure is a minefield that's only worth it when on a .NET stack.

Re Azure, what makes you say that? Can you be specific?

Re: How Facebook deals with PCIe faults to keep its data centers running reliably

#29

> also important to rate-limit remediations and repairs as a safety net to prevent bugs in the code from mass draining and unprovisioning, which can result in service outages if not handled properly. This is the most important bit for someone reimplementing this... Never let automation 'run wild' - always have a maximum number of machines per second it can act on, and a maximum percentage of the fleet unhealthy to al…

I agree wholeheartedly. Computers can do the wrong thing at incredible speed sometimes. This reminds me of the anecdote that nuclear submarine designers knowingly don't automate some things because if the automation would fail then it would cause the loss of the entire sub quickly enough that the situation is beyond salvage by the time humans can react. Instead, they have an extensive checklist and do all procedures with 2 people and a third over an audio line. Even if it does go wrong, it will probably go wrong slowly enough that a concerted damage control effort from the rest of the crew can contain the problem.

Re: How Facebook deals with PCIe faults to keep its data centers running reliably

#30

Sucks that I have to worry while reading their technical blog post that it's pretty likely that Facebook is tracking the fact that I'm reading their article.

At least they dont use a misleading/lying cookie wall. “WE CaRe AbOuT yOuR PrIvaCy, please click accept or open this huge modal with 100 checkboxes to disable all trackers one by one”
Post reply on HN