Live data from Hacker News

Beads: Computer language and toolchain

beadslang.org

21–30 of 235 posts

Re: Beads: Computer language and toolchain

#21
post #10

This is their example of Fizzbuzz: https://github.com/magicmouse/beads-examples/blob/master/Exa... But this is supposed to replace Excel somehow? Along with basically every other language. I can't accuse them of not being ambitious.

    //  this shows a persistent value FizzBuzz grid
    //  whatever cell you pick is remembered for a month
Wait, what?

Re: Beads: Computer language and toolchain

#22
post #5

Is the beadslang website made in beads?

Since I saw the "replace the entire stack" image, I expect no less than that the website should be made in Beads, hosted on a server running Beads OS, and the frontend should be WebAssembly compiled from Beads.

Re: Beads: Computer language and toolchain

#23

This seems like the brain child of one ambitious smart person that still needs to receive feedback from the outside world.

We need these kind of experiments. If you learn too much about contemporary software engineering, then it is almost certain that you'll end up with a React front-end talking to a NodeJS/Java back-end hosted on Kubernetes. Which is obviously the right thing most of the time :) but the world is richer because of these super-ambitious, super-naive experiments.

Also: imagine how much has someone learned from implementing all this.

Re: Beads: Computer language and toolchain

#25
post #18
post #8

A lot of bold claims here. As someone who's worked on a lot of Excel business tools I can tell you there's no way something like this could replace anything in the companies I've worked for.

In the illustration of the stack of things it replaces, it includes "Unix". Which is... you know... a claim one could make.

I'm sick of this kind of cynicism on HN. I'll have you know that I've already managed to replace my car with Beads.

Re: Beads: Computer language and toolchain

#26
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In the illustration of the stack of things it replaces, it includes "Unix". Which is... you know... a claim one could make.

I'm sick of this kind of cynicism on HN. I'll have you know that I've already managed to replace my car with Beads.

That’s nothing, I’m simulating the universe that you think you’re living in on beads.

Re: Beads: Computer language and toolchain

#27

This seems like the brain child of one ambitious smart person that still needs to receive feedback from the outside world.

We need these kind of experiments. If you learn too much about contemporary software engineering, then it is almost certain that you'll end up with a React front-end talking to a NodeJS/Java back-end hosted on Kubernetes. Which is obviously the right thing most of the time :) but the world is richer because of these super-ambitious, super-naive experiments. Also: imagine how much has someone learned from implementing…

I've done a super naive and ambitious startup idea. It was a big waste of time and I should have listened to more feedback.

The world isn't richer if you listen to feedback quite the opposite it makes you improve what you are making.

I agree about the learning aspect but overhyping something doesn't really pan out that well.

Re: Beads: Computer language and toolchain

#30
It looks interesting. The reference card immediately made me think of the J vocab reference card (the old one, not the Nuvoc one!). I do like the declarative nature of beads, and it does remind me of Red or Rebol in a way as someone has already commented here.
Post reply on HN