21–27 of 27 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
At least donate them to a charity...
No, I don’t respect any charity enough to deserve the keys. Sorry.
There are a ton of amazing charities doing incredibly underfunded work. Even small amounts of money can make a big difference.
I'm an academic researcher that studies nonprofits. I could recommend a few if you like?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
No, I don’t respect any charity enough to deserve the keys. Sorry.
Sorry this is off topic, but you seriously don't respect a single charity? There are a ton of amazing charities doing incredibly underfunded work. Even small amounts of money can make a big difference. I'm an academic researcher that studies nonprofits. I could recommend a few if you like?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Attorney.
Can't be coerced into handing over information you leave them if it is involved in ongoing proceedings?
This is known as attorney-client privilege. They are required to maintain it even when you stop paying.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Can't be coerced into handing over information you leave them if it is involved in ongoing proceedings?
No, not in the USA under normal circumstances. This is known as attorney-client privilege. They are required to maintain it even when you stop paying.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
- Split words in 3 groups - at least two groups are needed to assemble full phrase - spread each 1/3 in different entities - ex: lawyer, safe, relative - write a will authorizing kids access all 3 places
Thanks for responding. I understand it's all about threat modelling but would this necessarily be too much of an issue for a government to gain access to? The will would still describe how to bring all the information together.
Of course bank safety deposit box is an easy target, but it's easy to spread more pieces among lawyers, family, even friends, even without them knowing what it is.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Can't be coerced into handing over information you leave them if it is involved in ongoing proceedings?
No, not in the USA under normal circumstances. This is known as attorney-client privilege. They are required to maintain it even when you stop paying.
Where I think there is a problem is the non-reversible nature of transactions lend themselves to hostage-taking or adduction schemes by cartels and criminals etc... that's where I think crypto is very weak.