Live data from Hacker News

Should Google just become a VC fund?

carter.sprigings.com

21–25 of 25 posts

Re: Should Google just become a VC fund?

#21
post #4

> While the information isn’t public, we can safely assume that less than 5%, or 2,954 engineers, work directly or indirectly on Google Ads (Google Search, Youtube, etc.). Where does this assumption come from? I don't think this is even remotely close to the truth.

I think we should explain this more clearly to the original author; it’s probably true that maybe 5% work on ads but that is literally the ads system like Adwords and Adsense. The only reason those are valuable is that Google has tons of traffic and that traffic is driven by the work of the other 95% working on sub-verticals, core search, Youtube, etc.

If you take away the people working on those these services would stagnate and people will start going to another search engine and then you lose revenue.

Re: Should Google just become a VC fund?

#22
In addition to the terrible flaws with this thing that everyone else has pointed out (summary: "all the other stuff google does is necessary for the ads revenue to continue"), isn't this basically what 20% time was? I mean, formally different in that Google kept a 100% stake in anything that was produced that way, but pretty close.

Re: Should Google just become a VC fund?

#23
This seems to be riddled with assumptions that suggest a lack of experience with enterprise-sized companies.

Good built an ecosystem of products that capture your attention...so that they can monetize your attention.

They also have Google Cloud, which is quickly converging with all of Google's productivity tools.

Lastlt, why would Google ever exit a business that's generating so much cash?

Re: Should Google just become a VC fund?

#24

Google does have it's own internal "VC fund" (Area 120) which has yet to produce anything of significance. Not a lot of engineers actually want to start their own company, they are happy to just come and engineer new products/services dictated by PMs/leadership/etc.

I'm pretty sure they do want to run their own companies, but they can't afford to lose health insurance and they gotta pay their grossly overpriced mortgages.
Post reply on HN