Live data from Hacker News

Facebook approves alcohol, vaping and gambling ads targeting 13-17 year olds

abc.net.au

21–30 of 101 posts

Re: Facebook approves alcohol, vaping and gambling ads targeting 13-17 year olds

#21
post #17

this part seems important: ""Citing ethical concerns, Reset Australia did not pay for the advertisements and they did not run on the Facebook platform, but the group believes they had passed the company's internal checks""

I wonder what would have happened if they had? Maybe redirect it to a blank page? Might not have passed an ethics board (but hey, who knows nowadays!) if they actually advertised it though.

Re: Facebook approves alcohol, vaping and gambling ads targeting 13-17 year olds

#23
post #13

I hope this means they'll re-eval their policy on 21+ cannabis related ads. huge market potential

Cannabis is illegal at a federal level.

So is alcohol under 21?

Edit: looks like I learned something; thanks!

Re: Facebook approves alcohol, vaping and gambling ads targeting 13-17 year olds

#24
While it is obviously unethical, is advertising alcohol, vaping and gambling to 13-17 year olds illegal in Australia?

Asking because I am not sure if Facebook should be making the shots here on what is legal or illegal to advertise. This is best handled through government.

Re: Facebook approves alcohol, vaping and gambling ads targeting 13-17 year olds

#25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The associated comments that are downvoted seem to imply that Facebook intended for this to happen and it wasn't just automation and bureaucracy. Should it be stopped? If it violates the law, absolutely; but, we should recognize it for what it is, not some nefarious, evil plot to harm the young of multiple nations.

True, it's not malicious intent; if facebook could squeeze every cent out of their platform while advertising scented candles, they certainly would. It's the indifference that matters though.

Not sure intent is relevant. Does intent matter when the system is so huge and no single person probably understands or directs it? The Purpose Of A System Is What It Does [1].

1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_purpose_of_a_system_is_wha...

Re: Facebook approves alcohol, vaping and gambling ads targeting 13-17 year olds

#27

I guess I just don't really care if teenagers are doing the same things I did as a teenager.

My father grew up when it was incredibly common in high school to smoke a lot of cigarettes. Many in his class have since died of lung cancer. In my high school, vapes are the most dangerous thing I've seen. Generally, you hope the next generation grows up a little bit better than the previous one.

I think alcohol/vaping/gambling ads are a net negative when advertised to minors, causing addiction in a lot of cases.

Re: Facebook approves alcohol, vaping and gambling ads targeting 13-17 year olds

#28
post #13

I hope this means they'll re-eval their policy on 21+ cannabis related ads. huge market potential

Cannabis is illegal at a federal level.

so is minors gambling (which is this case) - and also these ads never ran. so no change for cannabis and we can put our pitchforks down.

Re: Facebook approves alcohol, vaping and gambling ads targeting 13-17 year olds

#30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

True, it's not malicious intent; if facebook could squeeze every cent out of their platform while advertising scented candles, they certainly would. It's the indifference that matters though.

Not sure intent is relevant. Does intent matter when the system is so huge and no single person probably understands or directs it? The Purpose Of A System Is What It Does [1]. 1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_purpose_of_a_system_is_wha...

The ultimate issue is that Facebook is incentivized to allow more ads on the platform. Their ad system does need to be fixed, I agree.

Intent doesn't matter much, I agree; it's the final result, which is that they are advertising ads that make them more money, which is more commonly immoral things like gambling to minors, etc. Like I said, it's the fact that Facebook largely doesn't care where it goes as long as they make money (as can be seen by their ad systems) that is more telling than their intent.

Post reply on HN