Live data from Hacker News

Mastodon Renaming “Toots” to “Posts”

github.com

21–30 of 110 posts

Re: Mastodon Renaming “Toots” to “Posts”

#21
post #13

Where does it say in the discussion that it was accepted? Someone suggested that it be done, and most seem to be against and no conclusion has been reached at the bottom, as far as I can tell.

It shows "Changes Approved" at the bottom. I've never done any collaboration work on github, does that mean it's happening?

no, that just means someone has given approval. The more relevant bit to "will this be merged" is that Gargron is pretty much the BDFL of Mastodon.

Re: Mastodon Renaming “Toots” to “Posts”

#22
I know little about Mastodon, but it seems like somebody went out of their way to make the cringiest sounding product possible. “Hey man, I just tooted on mastodon!” It really sounds like parody. I hope I am just missing the point.

You might say this is a superficial criticism, but I think naming is important when it comes to social appeal. At least, it becomes important when the naming has gone so horribly wrong.

If they’re changing course there might be hope yet.

Re: Mastodon Renaming “Toots” to “Posts”

#23
post #10

> The word “toot” is a part of mastodon, it fits, people know what you mean. If you take that away you take away a part of mastodon’s soul. Proof people will react dramatically to basically any change, I guess. More importantly, as Blikkentrekker has pointed out, this hasn't been merged yet, and in fact from the comments seems to be very unpopular. Possibly it won't be merged at all.

> people know what you mean

If someone tells me "hey wanna toot with me" I certainly don't think I'd have a clue what they meant.

Re: Mastodon Renaming “Toots” to “Posts”

#24

I know little about Mastodon, but it seems like somebody went out of their way to make the cringiest sounding product possible. “Hey man, I just tooted on mastodon!” It really sounds like parody. I hope I am just missing the point. You might say this is a superficial criticism, but I think naming is important when it comes to social appeal. At least, it becomes important when the naming has gone so horribly wrong. If…

I just googled Mastodon, and I think you're right. Now I'm going to go tweet about it.

Re: Mastodon Renaming “Toots” to “Posts”

#25
post #3

As someone who doesn’t use Mastadon, I immediately went to the toots -> farts connection. I get that a Mastadon is an elephant, elephants trumpet or “toot”, so, toot is a post. A lot of people are going to think of farts though.

Same. As an American, I would be much less likely to use or spread good word about a product that centered around the act of "tooting". Our culture sees the word as silly, childish, and a bit gross. I could get used to it eventually, but if it's the first thing I see about the product, I'm probably going to find something else to use that doesn't make me think of farting or introduce fart terminology into my everyday…

Yes. If you wanted to be charitable, the other connotation is tooting your own horn, which isn't that great either. Bragging is better than farts, though.

Re: Mastodon Renaming “Toots” to “Posts”

#26
post #7

I approve. No one asked me, but if they had, I'd have opined that the pre-cuting of your nomenclature is usually the result of too much time spent thinking about branding and not enough time building features. Note that "tweet" was spawned organically by the community, and Twitter did not adopt the word formally for a couple years after it was in popular use.

> is usually the result of too much time spent thinking about branding and not enough time building features.

Uh, I think you might have it backwards there. The Mastodon folks probably didn't spend enough time thinking about branding.

Re: Mastodon Renaming “Toots” to “Posts”

#28

I know little about Mastodon, but it seems like somebody went out of their way to make the cringiest sounding product possible. “Hey man, I just tooted on mastodon!” It really sounds like parody. I hope I am just missing the point. You might say this is a superficial criticism, but I think naming is important when it comes to social appeal. At least, it becomes important when the naming has gone so horribly wrong. If…

Many people felt the same way about tweeting. I doubt it makes enough of a difference to matter one way or the other.

Re: Mastodon Renaming “Toots” to “Posts”

#29
post #3

As someone who doesn’t use Mastadon, I immediately went to the toots -> farts connection. I get that a Mastadon is an elephant, elephants trumpet or “toot”, so, toot is a post. A lot of people are going to think of farts though.

Same. As an American, I would be much less likely to use or spread good word about a product that centered around the act of "tooting". Our culture sees the word as silly, childish, and a bit gross. I could get used to it eventually, but if it's the first thing I see about the product, I'm probably going to find something else to use that doesn't make me think of farting or introduce fart terminology into my everyday…

Being a native English speaker from another country I don't possess this association at all, and have to dig quite deep to remember that Americans do.

I do get tootsuite => toute de suite i.e. a sense of immediacy, the present moment, with greater impact for being a bilingual pun. Along with that, the onomatopoeic elephant.

Cynical take: notwithstanding the denial in the PR, that original author knew the scatological allusion, and that it has parochial scope, i.e. they actively intended to annoy Americans, and in particular those with a prim streak.

Re: Mastodon Renaming “Toots” to “Posts”

#30
post #3

As someone who doesn’t use Mastadon, I immediately went to the toots -> farts connection. I get that a Mastadon is an elephant, elephants trumpet or “toot”, so, toot is a post. A lot of people are going to think of farts though.

I take it as self deprecating. Most things people write online is shit- including my comment. Get off your high horse, you aren't special, you're making farting noises online.
Post reply on HN