Live data from Hacker News

Man Built a $188M Fortune Investing in Stocks Then Donated It to Charity

joshuakennon.com

21–30 of 161 posts

Re: Man Built a $188M Fortune Investing in Stocks Then Donated It to Charity

#21
post #3

From the article: Most millionaires opt for stealth wealth. Their friends don’t know, their coworkers don’t know, their extended family doesn’t know. In a few cases, not even their children know! Wealth is accumulated through habits; at least in a free society like ours. At the moment, something like 1 out of 25 households falls into the millionaire category, most of it self-made. From the comments: Your right in Jac…

Compounding is also a huge factor in cases like this. If you make (or inherit) money early in life, even if you don’t add much principal, 70 years of compounding does wonders for wealth creation.

Re: Man Built a $188M Fortune Investing in Stocks Then Donated It to Charity

#22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> "Wealth is accumulated through habits" > his wealth was inherited I really dislike these kind's of articles.

The two statements aren't incongruent. People who inherit money but spend it all because of bad habits don't accumulate wealth.

Similarly, people who don't inherit money can't spend it, and for the most part also don't accumulate wealth!

Re: Man Built a $188M Fortune Investing in Stocks Then Donated It to Charity

#23
post #6
post #3

From the article: Most millionaires opt for stealth wealth. Their friends don’t know, their coworkers don’t know, their extended family doesn’t know. In a few cases, not even their children know! Wealth is accumulated through habits; at least in a free society like ours. At the moment, something like 1 out of 25 households falls into the millionaire category, most of it self-made. From the comments: Your right in Jac…

> very often This can just be replaced with "always". You can be lucky or you can have inherited wealth.

Luck is very subjective.

Having opportunities around is lucky, but most people aren't interested in taking the risks or making sacrifices necessary to seize those opportunities.

And often times the ones willing to do this are then later called lucky.

Re: Man Built a $188M Fortune Investing in Stocks Then Donated It to Charity

#24
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What percentage of those millionaires are house-rich? I.e. the house they live in just happened to appreciate significantly and is now worth over $1mm? Those people can still feel as if they are not wealthy at all.

They still have $1 million dollars more than someone without a house

I mean yes, but when you've built your life in a place, it's little comfort being a "millionaire" if the only way to cash in on it is to pull up stakes and move hundreds of kilometers away.

Re: Man Built a $188M Fortune Investing in Stocks Then Donated It to Charity

#25
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What percentage of those millionaires are house-rich? I.e. the house they live in just happened to appreciate significantly and is now worth over $1mm? Those people can still feel as if they are not wealthy at all.

They still have $1 million dollars more than someone without a house

Which is helpful if they want to and are able to move to an area with lower real estate prices. Otherwise that 'wealth' is tied up in a good they are unable to sell (without incurring an implicit debt of either needing to find another house in the same high price area, or having to pay for rent in the same high price area).

A house may be a reasonable investment vehicle; it can also be an extremely illiquid one.

Re: Man Built a $188M Fortune Investing in Stocks Then Donated It to Charity

#26
post #3

From the article: Most millionaires opt for stealth wealth. Their friends don’t know, their coworkers don’t know, their extended family doesn’t know. In a few cases, not even their children know! Wealth is accumulated through habits; at least in a free society like ours. At the moment, something like 1 out of 25 households falls into the millionaire category, most of it self-made. From the comments: Your right in Jac…

well this is mostly semantics: the quote does not contradict, most of the wealth was self-made. as in the profits accumulated during their lifetime, it doesn't say anything about how the first one million or any amount was made. your consternation requires you to have a fixed and shared definition of self made that is just not described at all here. it does leave a glaring hole about then which wealth was not self-ma…

stocks literally represent the right to control capital and be paid by others who do work using that capital. it's the most explicit form of "not my labor" in the entire economy and i'm not sure why you expect op to explain that

Re: Man Built a $188M Fortune Investing in Stocks Then Donated It to Charity

#27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I mean, it takes money to make money. It's a lot easier to get a hundred million dollars when you start out with 1 million to put in the stock market.

> It's a lot easier to get a hundred million dollars when you start out with 1 million to put in the stock market. This statement could only ever be uttered by someone that has not tried to do this. 100x increase in any endeavor is extremely exceptional. It's as hard to do as turning $10,000 into $1,000,000. The only thing having a larger starting amount helps with is that it opens up types of opportunities you did n…

Bullshit. This guy had decades and decades of compounding returns. The article itself admits:

> Had he just parked $1,000 in a basket of equities when he turned 18, it would have been worth $2,048,400 at his death.

Re: Man Built a $188M Fortune Investing in Stocks Then Donated It to Charity

#28
post #3

From the article: Most millionaires opt for stealth wealth. Their friends don’t know, their coworkers don’t know, their extended family doesn’t know. In a few cases, not even their children know! Wealth is accumulated through habits; at least in a free society like ours. At the moment, something like 1 out of 25 households falls into the millionaire category, most of it self-made. From the comments: Your right in Jac…

well this is mostly semantics: the quote does not contradict, most of the wealth was self-made. as in the profits accumulated during their lifetime, it doesn't say anything about how the first one million or any amount was made. your consternation requires you to have a fixed and shared definition of self made that is just not described at all here. it does leave a glaring hole about then which wealth was not self-ma…

> alimony? child support?

Alimony implies marriage. In marriage all the money earned belongs to both parties. If there's only a single earner and the other is a nurturer, so what? It's still both party's money. Alimony is there to help the nurturer transition back to an earner.

Child support is, well, you made them, support them. Simple.

Re: Man Built a $188M Fortune Investing in Stocks Then Donated It to Charity

#30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I mean, it takes money to make money. It's a lot easier to get a hundred million dollars when you start out with 1 million to put in the stock market.

> It's a lot easier to get a hundred million dollars when you start out with 1 million to put in the stock market. This statement could only ever be uttered by someone that has not tried to do this. 100x increase in any endeavor is extremely exceptional. It's as hard to do as turning $10,000 into $1,000,000. The only thing having a larger starting amount helps with is that it opens up types of opportunities you did n…

> It's as hard to do as turning $10,000 into $1,000,000.

It's hard, but provably not as hard. If you don't need the money, you can afford to take more and better risk with it.

More risk is enough to get this article (not even necessarily better risk) - if 100 people take a pure 100:1 bet, then 1 can get an article like this.

[As mentioned in the sibling comment, if you have enough time, then hard becomes easy]

Post reply on HN