Live data from Hacker News

Comparison of Postsurgical Scars Between Vegan and Omnivore Patients

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

21–30 of 112 posts

Re: Comparison of Postsurgical Scars Between Vegan and Omnivore Patients

#21

What's the point of having a better looking scar if you're more likely to get colon cancer? Also, given that study itself measured Iron and B12, supplementing Iron and B12 may help scar healing w/o the (red) meat eating downside.

> Also, given that study itself measured Iron and B12, supplementing Iron and B12 may help scar healing w/o the (red) meat eating downside

Unless iron is the source of the (red) meat eating downside.

Re: Comparison of Postsurgical Scars Between Vegan and Omnivore Patients

#22
This journal isn’t open access is it?

I wanted so see the effect sizes not just p values which are unhelpful. But if the vegans are all vitamin b12 deficient, it’s not a surprise their health has consequences.

And my other question is, is there self selection going on. People who go to hospitals have worse outcomes than people who don’t, so the best thing to do is to avoid hospitals. P I’d really like to read the article to see if they considered these things.

Re: Comparison of Postsurgical Scars Between Vegan and Omnivore Patients

#23

What's the point of having a better looking scar if you're more likely to get colon cancer? Also, given that study itself measured Iron and B12, supplementing Iron and B12 may help scar healing w/o the (red) meat eating downside.

It's not even clear what's meant by "red meat". In all the studies they mix up consumption of unprocessed and processed meats. In my totally non-scientific metastudy I came to the conclusion that it's essentially processed meat with nitrates that poses the major health threat.

Re: Comparison of Postsurgical Scars Between Vegan and Omnivore Patients

#24
post #2

> This study suggests that a vegan diet may negatively influence the outcome of surgical scars. This is unusually damning to veganism-as-it-is-practiced if not to veganism itself. It would be interesting to see these results across a wide range of diets.

One of several motte-and-bailey tactics used by vegans is going from “Veganism is healthy” To “Veganism can be healthy if you exercise an impressive amount of restraint, discipline, and judgement in your vegan diet”

_If_ you can get enough exercise, you can be healthy on pretty much any omnivore diet because it's so hard to not get enough nutrition, and extra calories don't matter if you burn them off. I personally lost lots of weight when I was cycling regularly to work and school (10km and 50km round trip respectively), as well as caving and climbing on weekends. Almost everything I ate was fast food, because I had hardly any spare time. But I was definitely healthy and felt great so long as I took enough days off (I was getting enough exercise that I simply couldn't do it every day).

Meanwhile, I know lots of people who have given up on vegan diets because they felt like their health was declining, even with regular exercise. I'm sure with enough care and nutritional science they could have gotten it to work. But it's so much easier to just add some animal products to your diet.

Re: Comparison of Postsurgical Scars Between Vegan and Omnivore Patients

#25

What's the point of having a better looking scar if you're more likely to get colon cancer? Also, given that study itself measured Iron and B12, supplementing Iron and B12 may help scar healing w/o the (red) meat eating downside.

Attributing colon cancer to meat is, it turns out, complete bullshit, just like most other nonsense anti-meat fear-mongering (uric acid, cholesterol, etc.).

I'm not familiar with the data either way, so am reading to learn; why do you say it's bullshit?

Re: Comparison of Postsurgical Scars Between Vegan and Omnivore Patients

#26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Attributing colon cancer to meat is, it turns out, complete bullshit, just like most other nonsense anti-meat fear-mongering (uric acid, cholesterol, etc.).

I'm not familiar with the data either way, so am reading to learn; why do you say it's bullshit?

In context, I think it’s as fair to call it bullshit as to claim it as a truth.

It was being claimed as a truth to rebut the implications a peer reviewed study, but without any data to support it.

Re: Comparison of Postsurgical Scars Between Vegan and Omnivore Patients

#27
post #2

> This study suggests that a vegan diet may negatively influence the outcome of surgical scars. This is unusually damning to veganism-as-it-is-practiced if not to veganism itself. It would be interesting to see these results across a wide range of diets.

> This is unusually damning to veganism-as-it-is-practiced if not to veganism itself.

I don't think a sample size of 21 is especially damning. Nor do I think that the study's authors would come to that conclusion either.

Re: Comparison of Postsurgical Scars Between Vegan and Omnivore Patients

#28
I would like to see a comparison between the top 10% vegan and omnivores. Most vegans are clueless when it comes to making up deficiencies in typical vegan diets.

Glycine is one of the relevant aminos that is very suboptimal or even scarce in vegetarian and vegan diets. It is also going to be one of the important (and likely most common) limiting factors in tissue repair.

Proline is also needed for collagen production, but not as deficient in Glycine as far as vegetarian diets. Glycine is also highly water soluble and a small molecule; it is constantly lost in urine. The need for glycine goes way beyond collagen production. It is essential for so many biological functions.

Glycine is not considered an "essential amino" because the body produces glycine itself, hence it is overlooked by many. It turns out the body produces only enough to usually barely scrape by. My guess is if another group of vegans were given Glycine (at around 4 to 5 grams/day) supplementation the disadvantage relative to omnivores would be erased.

Re: Comparison of Postsurgical Scars Between Vegan and Omnivore Patients

#29
post #2

> This study suggests that a vegan diet may negatively influence the outcome of surgical scars. This is unusually damning to veganism-as-it-is-practiced if not to veganism itself. It would be interesting to see these results across a wide range of diets.

I'm not sure any of the vegans I know would give up veganism in order to minimize their scars any more than the meat-eaters I know would give up meat based on studies that show it can be mildly unhealthy.

Re: Comparison of Postsurgical Scars Between Vegan and Omnivore Patients

#30
Strange way to word the two patient types: vegans as opposed to omnivores. Vegans are still omnivores, they just stopped eating animal products because of beliefs.

I also smelled once a vegan cake. It's a medical miracle they can survive on such a diet.

Post reply on HN