21–30 of 296 posts
The issue with this black lists is that all the antiviruses/security tools will immediately put you on their list but it can take days or weeks to have them remove you and you can still get some customer that uses some weird security program that he still gets the issue. One of the anti-viruses company has a form to submit a dispute but their form was broken for weeks.
Your cert is triggering SSL_ERROR_BAD_CERT_DOMAIN.
I made a Wordpress site last year to start blogging that had this happen. The only reason I found out in this case was from visiting it in edge, which showed a warning pop up, so maybe it was a Microsoft flag instead of google in this case. I never figured out the cause or a way to remedy it and just took the site offline because it was invisible to all search engines. Pretty disappointing
From the article: > So after a lot of brainstorming and ideas from HNers I finally figured out the culprit(s). > We have a live demo on our home where people can upload a test file. [...] > We also give all users a 20MB test storage. [...] > I believe that somebody signed up for our service (it’s free to sign up) and then uploaded a malicious file on our test storage and abused this feature. If that is correct, Googl…
edit: just noticed, their comp.lang.c archives are back up now
> But there are plenty of Google engineers and good helpful people on Hacker news. > (from a screenshot) I work at Google [...] so I escalated your issue [...] > I believe the HN thread getting on the homepage tremendously helped me and somebody from Google saw it and expedited the review after all So, once more an issue with FAANG could only be fixed because somebody knew somebody else and went out of his way to get…
If you know important people at the emperor's court, you have a chance to get yor problem solved.
To be quite honest, this seems like a case of Libel and possibly Tortious Interference on behalf of Google/Alphabet. Especially if you can show damages/customers cancelling service, I think this would be a hill to die on. Google et al have too much power, even over people and orgs that aren't even customers. Its high time we reign their powers in, find them strongly culpable for what they do (and what they change and…
I think it's fairly easy to acknowledge the the following are all true: 1. The poster was hosting malicious content from their domain (user uploaded no doubt, but still on the domain they control). 2. On one hand, it is desirable that people who are not malicious be given enough information as fast as possible to rectify their sites. 3. On the other hand, this same sort of information can make it easier for malicious…
I never bought that excuse. That sounds like saying we should be secretive about legal charges brought against a person, lest that information help criminals evade detection.
NodeBB does host a demo instance to allow people to kick the tires. I don't believe we allow people to upload images, but it is worth double checking just in case.
> But there are plenty of Google engineers and good helpful people on Hacker news. > (from a screenshot) I work at Google [...] so I escalated your issue [...] > I believe the HN thread getting on the homepage tremendously helped me and somebody from Google saw it and expedited the review after all So, once more an issue with FAANG could only be fixed because somebody knew somebody else and went out of his way to get…
This is really feudalism replayed. If you know important people at the emperor's court, you have a chance to get yor problem solved.
> But there are plenty of Google engineers and good helpful people on Hacker news. > (from a screenshot) I work at Google [...] so I escalated your issue [...] > I believe the HN thread getting on the homepage tremendously helped me and somebody from Google saw it and expedited the review after all So, once more an issue with FAANG could only be fixed because somebody knew somebody else and went out of his way to get…
This is really feudalism replayed. If you know important people at the emperor's court, you have a chance to get yor problem solved.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Something tells me that Google doesn't ban G Drive, Dropbox or MS's what ever it is named when those host malware. I rather not have only the giants host user generated content ...
Google does the silly separate domain dance GP recommended. I couldn't figure out what is it for, until I read this advice in the previous discussion. Disclaimer: I'm a Google SRE. But never supported anything reachable from the outside.