Live data from Hacker News

Our Thoughts on Bitcoin

bridgewater.com

21–30 of 123 posts

Re: Our Thoughts on Bitcoin

#21

> while those who are against it (which are a few scared souls cowering in a corner) Way to win over your audience.

HN BTC skeptics are not the target audience. This is an ad targeting rich, nontechnical boomers who are unhappy they missed the ride up.

Edit. Nocoiner was removed from the previous comment as it was not intended to be taken this way. My Previous Response( Nocoiner sounds a lot like Antifa or MAGA. Is the goal to lump everyone who doesn't agree with you into a group to ridicule?)

Re: Our Thoughts on Bitcoin

#22
post #17

Another company shilling a coin, hoping to convince many more greater fools. Only goal of this article is to convince you to buy, and to transfer a part of your wealth to them.

Yes, surely these already billionaires whose entire business revolves around publishing analysis on assets, and who don't claim to be holding any major stake in BTC, could only be writing about it because they are shilling...

Re: Our Thoughts on Bitcoin

#24
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, this was absent from the analysis. Bitcoins security derives from computer power which is currently paid by combination of fees and inflation (mining). We have yet to see what happens to the prices and security when mining dries out. It would also be interesting to see a large market event that causes many people to move bitcoin at once. (What happens to transaction costs? Does this affect perception of bitcoin…

Bitcoin will have to adapt in a big way before inflation stops. It needs to crank transaction volume way up, or otherwise collect fees (for example smart contracts) in order to keep mining profitable. Scaling only the price of transactions is NOT going to work, but it has quite a bit of runway to figure this out.

Has the price of transactions gone up relative to the value of Bitcoin? (I don't have a dog in this race, just curious.)

Re: Our Thoughts on Bitcoin

#25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

HN BTC skeptics are not the target audience. This is an ad targeting rich, nontechnical boomers who are unhappy they missed the ride up.

Edit. Nocoiner was removed from the previous comment as it was not intended to be taken this way. My Previous Response( Nocoiner sounds a lot like Antifa or MAGA. Is the goal to lump everyone who doesn't agree with you into a group to ridicule?)

The same people lump themselves together as maximalists. Not every piece of language is some micro aggression identity attack.

Re: Our Thoughts on Bitcoin

#26
post #19
post #15

I'm surprised that the energy usage axis does not come up in this summary of his thoughts. Isn't that likely to be a factor in bitcoin's growth and long-term survival?

I can see Bitcoin hardfork to POS once the tech has been proven in Ethereum. Bitcoiners only care about the 21 millions hard cap and a secure network, not the exact consensus algorithm used.

Cardano will prove PoS sooner than Ethereum, and it has hard cap.

Yes I am a Cardano shiller.

Re: Our Thoughts on Bitcoin

#27

> while those who are against it (which are a few scared souls cowering in a corner) Way to win over your audience.

Dalio and Bridgewater's internal culture are famously weird and confrontational[0], so your reaction is probably intended. [0] https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2019-02-01/bridge...

I stopped reading after that sentence, as I figured any such characterization immediately showed bias - your comment pretty much confirms my suspicions.

Re: Our Thoughts on Bitcoin

#28
post #15

I'm surprised that the energy usage axis does not come up in this summary of his thoughts. Isn't that likely to be a factor in bitcoin's growth and long-term survival?

No, the energy usage is proportional to its economic value. If energy prices go up or down while nothing else changes, bitcoin's energy usage will go inversely. If bitcoin's value goes up or down while nothing else changes, energy usage will go the same.

Re: Our Thoughts on Bitcoin

#29
post #19
post #15

I'm surprised that the energy usage axis does not come up in this summary of his thoughts. Isn't that likely to be a factor in bitcoin's growth and long-term survival?

I can see Bitcoin hardfork to POS once the tech has been proven in Ethereum. Bitcoiners only care about the 21 millions hard cap and a secure network, not the exact consensus algorithm used.

PoS isn't as secure as PoW, though. I'd imagine the majority of BTC nodes would reject updating to a fork that removed PoW.

Re: Our Thoughts on Bitcoin

#30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

HN BTC skeptics are not the target audience. This is an ad targeting rich, nontechnical boomers who are unhappy they missed the ride up.

Edit. Nocoiner was removed from the previous comment as it was not intended to be taken this way. My Previous Response( Nocoiner sounds a lot like Antifa or MAGA. Is the goal to lump everyone who doesn't agree with you into a group to ridicule?)

Not my intention at all..updated the to BTC skeptics in case others were offended too.
Post reply on HN