Live data from Hacker News

The Irony in the GameStop Story

nasdaq.com

21–30 of 104 posts

Re: The Irony in the GameStop Story

#21
post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Gotta say I agree, after hearing non crap news for a year. It's nice to see a hedge fund eat their hat.

Until it cascades like Lehman and AIG with USA citizens holding the bag. In two days we are 33,333 days since the crash of 1929.

https://twitter.com/PigeonsK/status/1354824493982773249

Argument for cascading.

Re: The Irony in the GameStop Story

#22
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Until it cascades like Lehman and AIG with USA citizens holding the bag. In two days we are 33,333 days since the crash of 1929.

This is nothing like the size of the bubble (US housing market) that precipitated those crashes.

It is actually. The housing market had real collateral even if it was overly appraised.

Re: The Irony in the GameStop Story

#23
post #8

I still feel like these stories are missing a core distinction. If these WSB folks rallied around GME because they were true believers of a beloved brand with faith in a turn around plan, god love em. I think that’s an interesting phenomenon that upgrades retail collective trading in much the same ways mutual funds behave on behalf of loads of retail investors. But that’s not what happened. The brand is irrelevant. I…

I'm pretty sure bringing up fundamentals is intentional FUD. Nobody is investing in any of these because of fundamentals. It's the public vs hedge funds and GME et al is the battlefield.

The more people take part and have strong hands, the more the losses will be democratized, on the way to the real desired outcome against naked shorting hedge funds. I don't mind losing a couple hundred bucks investment for this.

Re: The Irony in the GameStop Story

#24
post #8

I still feel like these stories are missing a core distinction. If these WSB folks rallied around GME because they were true believers of a beloved brand with faith in a turn around plan, god love em. I think that’s an interesting phenomenon that upgrades retail collective trading in much the same ways mutual funds behave on behalf of loads of retail investors. But that’s not what happened. The brand is irrelevant. I…

I disagree. The brand isn’t everything but it isn’t nothing. Look at the targets so far. Companies for which there is a nontrivial amount of 90s and 00s nostalgia. If wsb is driven by 20-30 year olds, a narrative involving a fondly remembered company is going to stick better than one that nobody knows. I don’t think people truly believe in GameStop as a long term success, but the story travels faster if people can remember the name.

Look at Tesla. Musk’s cult of personality is clearly a component of the interest in the stock. I don’t think these are just abstract objects made of balance sheets.

Re: The Irony in the GameStop Story

#25
post #5

Off topic but I noticed a large number of large empty white spaces. Then I realised that my browser is blocking all those ads. Kind of sad how much of that page is ads.

And some of the adds are of the “this stock will be 35 times bigger than amazon” kind. Adding to the irony

99% of all investor relations is black-hat.

Re: The Irony in the GameStop Story

#26
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Until it cascades like Lehman and AIG with USA citizens holding the bag. In two days we are 33,333 days since the crash of 1929.

This is nothing like the size of the bubble (US housing market) that precipitated those crashes.

The bubble may become more visible if a chain reaction is started.

Re: The Irony in the GameStop Story

#27
post #8

I still feel like these stories are missing a core distinction. If these WSB folks rallied around GME because they were true believers of a beloved brand with faith in a turn around plan, god love em. I think that’s an interesting phenomenon that upgrades retail collective trading in much the same ways mutual funds behave on behalf of loads of retail investors. But that’s not what happened. The brand is irrelevant. I…

Why is now when we start caring about that, though? I don’t think the current position of GME is a reasonable one, but neither is the situation in which 140% of its shares have been shorted. And it’s not just academic: that makes it difficult for the business to grow. The hedge funds are literally trying to suffocate it into bankruptcy.

And yet no one raised the alarm then. No one worried about retail investors with a long position in GME, or the workers who could be laid off. The truth is that almost no one at all cared about the market being detached from reality or the ordinary people left holding the bag when the hedge funds were set to profit. But now that they’re losing, suddenly everyone is beside themselves with worry.

Re: The Irony in the GameStop Story

#29
Andrew Left of Citron Research today announced that Citron will no longer research and invest in shorts. They will now cover long positions. He's trying to reverse his image with WallStreetBets. I hope it is in good faith, he likely just sees an opportunity.

Re: The Irony in the GameStop Story

#30
post #8

I still feel like these stories are missing a core distinction. If these WSB folks rallied around GME because they were true believers of a beloved brand with faith in a turn around plan, god love em. I think that’s an interesting phenomenon that upgrades retail collective trading in much the same ways mutual funds behave on behalf of loads of retail investors. But that’s not what happened. The brand is irrelevant. I…

I agree with you, and on the flipside we need hedge funds and other “pro” investors to abide by the same rules. Big banks sure didn’t feel much pain in 2008...
Post reply on HN