Live data from Hacker News

Twitter improves API usage for researchers

blog.twitter.com

21–30 of 49 posts

Re: Twitter improves API usage for researchers

#21
post #3

Could have saved you some work, the research results are that Twitter is very liberal, less conservative and nobody has seen a libertarian for days.

you would think from the amount of republican/conservative accounts they have banned that they have some AI or parser dedicated to banning these types of voices

Re: Twitter improves API usage for researchers

#22
post #3

Could have saved you some work, the research results are that Twitter is very liberal, less conservative and nobody has seen a libertarian for days.

I'd think libertarians would love twitter, deplatforming is the free market at work and the government has no right to make them do business with anyone they choose not to

Twitter should be judged by the way it governs its platform. And from libertarian perspective it's governed poorly. Sure, under current laws they can get away with deplatforming in the way they do now, but there is nothing commendable or desirable about it for libertarians specifically.

Re: Twitter improves API usage for researchers

#23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Silence is a strong word -- I'm certainly still able to hear news from Donald Trump, even if he was banned from Twitter.

You're right about Trump. Most people don't have the platform he has. Many dissenting voices have been removed from the conversation, and you wouldn't even know they are missing.

Except I keep hearing about it constantly, everywhere, including Twitter. And yet I haven't seen a single one being banned for discussing fiscal policy, less regulation, conservative views on social programs etc. "Conservative voices [being] silenced" are almost always some variation of spamming evidently real-world damaging conspiracy theories or clear ToS violations.

Re: Twitter improves API usage for researchers

#24
post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And one might think liberals, putting liberty above order, would be aghast at silencing opponents to maintain order, and yet here we are. Our political theater has gotten pretty weird. The whole thing is looking more and more like unprincipled tribes vying for power.

Silence is a strong word -- I'm certainly still able to hear news from Donald Trump, even if he was banned from Twitter.

As someone that doesn't try I still hear news about Trump but no longer from Trump. That's a big (welcome) change.

Re: Twitter improves API usage for researchers

#25
post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'd think libertarians would love twitter, deplatforming is the free market at work and the government has no right to make them do business with anyone they choose not to

And one might think liberals, putting liberty above order, would be aghast at silencing opponents to maintain order, and yet here we are. Our political theater has gotten pretty weird. The whole thing is looking more and more like unprincipled tribes vying for power.

"silencing opponents"

Nobody here is silenced. You do not have a right to a twitter account. People can, and do, make accounts elsewhere.

Literally anything Trump does can and is covered by the media; this is exactly the opposite of being "silenced".

Re: Twitter improves API usage for researchers

#26
post #20

I wonder how are they going to enforce their rules, e.g. non-commercial use. I assume this will require some monitoring to be effective. Large scale Twitter API access is typically pricey, malicious actors might try to buy or steal researcher's credentials to cut costs.

I recently tried to sign up for Twitter API and the process is nothing like what it used to be. You have to give them a lot of information to even qualify, such as what you're going to use it for. It used to be that those were just some fields you need to fill out and you could sign up immediately. But nowadays the application process requires a direct approval from their team, which means they're monitoring every API account like Apple does with their app store. And if you like about your usage you are probably liable

Re: Twitter improves API usage for researchers

#27
post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You're right about Trump. Most people don't have the platform he has. Many dissenting voices have been removed from the conversation, and you wouldn't even know they are missing.

Except I keep hearing about it constantly, everywhere, including Twitter. And yet I haven't seen a single one being banned for discussing fiscal policy, less regulation, conservative views on social programs etc. "Conservative voices [being] silenced" are almost always some variation of spamming evidently real-world damaging conspiracy theories or clear ToS violations.

I didn't say conservative - I said dissenting. Although I imagine many conservatives have learned to self-censor so they can remain part of the conversation there.

How about asserting that men and women are different biologically? Is that a conspiracy theory?

Or is it simply a dissenting viewpoint from the group-think of Twitter that was silenced...

https://thefederalist.com/2018/11/25/twitter-permanently-ban...

Re: Twitter improves API usage for researchers

#29
post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Except I keep hearing about it constantly, everywhere, including Twitter. And yet I haven't seen a single one being banned for discussing fiscal policy, less regulation, conservative views on social programs etc. "Conservative voices [being] silenced" are almost always some variation of spamming evidently real-world damaging conspiracy theories or clear ToS violations.

I didn't say conservative - I said dissenting. Although I imagine many conservatives have learned to self-censor so they can remain part of the conversation there. How about asserting that men and women are different biologically? Is that a conspiracy theory? Or is it simply a dissenting viewpoint from the group-think of Twitter that was silenced... https://thefederalist.com/2018/11/25/twitter-permanently-ban...

> In late 2018, Twitter changed its policy on hateful conduct and harassment to officially prohibit intentionally calling a trans person by the wrong pronouns or using their pre-transition names.[62] Beginning in August 2018, Murphy stated that her Twitter account was locked more than once after she tweeted about issues involving trans women.[63] Twitter permanently suspended Murphy's account in late November 2018, after she referred to Jessica Yaniv, a trans woman, as "him".[64][65][66] On February 11, 2019, Murphy filed a lawsuit against Twitter in response to her banning.[67] The suit was dismissed in early June, but Murphy stated that she intended to file an appeal.[68][69]

Clear ToS violation. Which proves my point.

Sidenote: The Federalist itself got its account banned from twitter for spreading covid misinformation.

Re: Twitter improves API usage for researchers

#30
post #29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I didn't say conservative - I said dissenting. Although I imagine many conservatives have learned to self-censor so they can remain part of the conversation there. How about asserting that men and women are different biologically? Is that a conspiracy theory? Or is it simply a dissenting viewpoint from the group-think of Twitter that was silenced... https://thefederalist.com/2018/11/25/twitter-permanently-ban...

> In late 2018, Twitter changed its policy on hateful conduct and harassment to officially prohibit intentionally calling a trans person by the wrong pronouns or using their pre-transition names.[62] Beginning in August 2018, Murphy stated that her Twitter account was locked more than once after she tweeted about issues involving trans women.[63] Twitter permanently suspended Murphy's account in late November 2018, a…

This thread started with:

> And one might think liberals, putting liberty above order, would be aghast at silencing opponents to maintain order, and yet here we are.

You aren't liberal, that's OK, and Twitter isn't a liberal platform, and definitely has a political bias towards the progressive left.

I'd rather make decisions for myself than let Twitter tell me what is or isn't misinformation.

> Sidenote: The Federalist itself got its account banned from twitter for spreading covid misinformation.

Thanks for proving my point

Post reply on HN