Criticizing Bitcoin investment for speculation rings hollow when the majority of equity investment is speculation. Very few people invest with the intention of never selling. The news has a daily ritual of reporting the rising and falling of stock prices.
Well, when you buy shares, you buy a stake in the company, i.e. a share in the company's assets, which per se represent a value (and of course can be completely overvalued). When you buy precious metals, they also have an intrinsic value. What countervalue do you have when you buy Bitcoins?
Bitcoin Is a Ponzi
21–23 of 23 posts
Re: Bitcoin Is a Ponzi
#22Earlier quoted context omitted.
There are a lot of other precious metals than gold, some with heavy use by industry. And even if industry doesn't use a lot of gold, it has its merits; you can store it, it's persistent, and you can use it as a means of payment. Bitcoins are virtual, a promise with no government guarantee; you can't put your hands on them; they're too complicated for most people to handle, and if there's no electricity or computer ne…
You also can't put your hands on email, or videos, or most US Dollars. That doesn't mean they cannot be useful and valuable. Gold's value is based on people wanting it. Bitcoin's value is based on exactly the same thing: higher demand than supply.
Already the monetary currency of most countries is built on sand and one is well advised not to hold all one's assets in cash. Until someone finds a formula to produce gold cheaply (like diamonds), it will continue to be a useful currency with good inflation protection; of course, you wouldn't invest your entire fortune in gold either. But with Bitcoins, we have more of a situation like we had with investment certificates; they may also protect against inflation if everything works as promised, but they can also vanish into thin air very quickly.
Re: Bitcoin Is a Ponzi
#23This conversation is distinct from blockchain as a technology, no?