Earlier quoted context omitted.
I still do not understand, as they do not carry Qubits, but they use laser to transmit information, why not use the laser in the first place to transmit information?
couldn’t find a reference to laser in the article; where did you read this?
Scientists just teleported an object into Earth's orbit for the first time (2017)
21–30 of 31 posts
Re: Scientists just teleported an object into Earth's orbit for the first time (2017)
#22Can someone please explain how is quantum teleportation different than, transmitting information about object and then making another object behave the same way as the first one?
Re: Scientists just teleported an object into Earth's orbit for the first time (2017)
#23Re: Scientists just teleported an object into Earth's orbit for the first time (2017)
#24Re: Scientists just teleported an object into Earth's orbit for the first time (2017)
#25Can someone please explain how is quantum teleportation different than, transmitting information about object and then making another object behave the same way as the first one?
It’s worse than that. You have a pair of photons. You have no idea what state they are in because they aren’t. You send me one. You cannot influence if I’ll get it in the 1 or the 0 state. All you can do is later measure your photon and see what state it’s in and that will tell you what state my photon is in. It won’t let you transmit information IIUC and it won’t let you travel faster than light. It might help with…
Re: Scientists just teleported an object into Earth's orbit for the first time (2017)
#26Is a photon an object?
I guess you should ask ‘Is click bait an accurate summary?’ Instead :) I think it will come down to how you define an object-I don’t think that’s a scientific term.
Re: Scientists just teleported an object into Earth's orbit for the first time (2017)
#27Earlier quoted context omitted.
It’s worse than that. You have a pair of photons. You have no idea what state they are in because they aren’t. You send me one. You cannot influence if I’ll get it in the 1 or the 0 state. All you can do is later measure your photon and see what state it’s in and that will tell you what state my photon is in. It won’t let you transmit information IIUC and it won’t let you travel faster than light. It might help with…
You actually have no idea when and if the other entangled thing was measured. I'm at my limits of understanding, but I believe it makes no difference when you collapse them. You could do it before moving them apart and the whole process is the same. In fact, process is probably an inadequate word. The particles always shared a state. There aren't two particles; there's a system, and that system was created from 2 par…
Re: Scientists just teleported an object into Earth's orbit for the first time (2017)
#28Can someone please explain how is quantum teleportation different than, transmitting information about object and then making another object behave the same way as the first one?
It’s worse than that. You have a pair of photons. You have no idea what state they are in because they aren’t. You send me one. You cannot influence if I’ll get it in the 1 or the 0 state. All you can do is later measure your photon and see what state it’s in and that will tell you what state my photon is in. It won’t let you transmit information IIUC and it won’t let you travel faster than light. It might help with…
Re: Scientists just teleported an object into Earth's orbit for the first time (2017)
#29Can someone please explain how is quantum teleportation different than, transmitting information about object and then making another object behave the same way as the first one?
It’s worse than that. You have a pair of photons. You have no idea what state they are in because they aren’t. You send me one. You cannot influence if I’ll get it in the 1 or the 0 state. All you can do is later measure your photon and see what state it’s in and that will tell you what state my photon is in. It won’t let you transmit information IIUC and it won’t let you travel faster than light. It might help with…
Re: Scientists just teleported an object into Earth's orbit for the first time (2017)
#30Can someone ELI5 why this doesn't break the "information can't move faster than the speed of light" rule?
Information is the result of an interpretation, not the data you try to share with a distant interpreter. As current widely admitted interpretation of red shift tell us, there are star moving away from us at a pace faster than speed of light, due to time-space inflation. And finally, one possible interpretation of quantic intrication is that the change reflected on two distant objects is that there are actually the s…
The expansion of spacetime is also accelerating. Stars that are very far away from us will be increasing their distance faster than light could travel. They are passing beyond our horizon.
What you call "quantic intrication" is usually referred to as quantum entanglement. Current working theories have it that entangled fields interact over a spacetime bridge (an Einstein-Rosen bridge) also known as a wormhole, between the two allowing locality of information exchange (ER=EPR conjecture).