Live data from Hacker News

Super-spreading wedding demonstrates Covid-19 risk posed by holiday gatherings

latimes.com

21–30 of 415 posts

Re: Super-spreading wedding demonstrates Covid-19 risk posed by holiday gatherings

#21
post #6

Epidemiologists from Stanford, Oxford and Harvard demand to immediately stop the devastating measures. http://gbdeclaration.org/

The only source I trust for my critical and unbiased coronavirus information is the "corona-research" user on Hacker News.

The username is cartoonishly transparent...I guess they offer internships at the Internet Research Agency.

User's comment history lines up with my expectations.

Re: Super-spreading wedding demonstrates Covid-19 risk posed by holiday gatherings

#23
post #20

What are HNers planning to do for the holidays? We’re seriously considering not seeing anyone, not even parents, even though my SO has had COVID already (she works at a hospital and contracted it from COVID patients). Stories like this are the main reason. Even if no one at the party gets very ill, the chance of further spreading it to others seriously scares me.

100% abstaining from any family gatherings. It's the only morally right choice right now.

Re: Super-spreading wedding demonstrates Covid-19 risk posed by holiday gatherings

#24
post #6

Epidemiologists from Stanford, Oxford and Harvard demand to immediately stop the devastating measures. http://gbdeclaration.org/

The only source I trust for my critical and unbiased coronavirus information is the "corona-research" user on Hacker News.

[flagged]

Re: Super-spreading wedding demonstrates Covid-19 risk posed by holiday gatherings

#25
post #3

Epidemiologists from Stanford, Oxford and Harvard demand to immediately stop the devastating measures. http://gbdeclaration.org/

That's faker than a 3 dollar bill. Many, many, of the "signatures" have been proven to be people that don't even exist. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/coronavirus-... https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2020/oct/27/facebook-p...

I don't know anything more about this than the two links you just posted, but the article in the Independent and the Politifact Fact Check certainly do not come to the conclusion that this "declaration" is fake.

The Independent piece is talking about some of the 150,000+ names signed by the public. Of course people on the Internet are going to add fake names to the list. That doesn't make the declaration fake.

The Politifact piece explicitly notes that the official signatories are real. It then goes into an explanation of why their heterodox opinion is wrong, which maybe it is. But that doesn't make it fake.

Re: Super-spreading wedding demonstrates Covid-19 risk posed by holiday gatherings

#26
For comparison with the 55 person gathering in August, here's a 10,000 person gathering in June, which was apparently perfectly OK from a coronavirus standpoint: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0U0J40Gn574

Double standards like these are why most people don't trust the mainstream media anymore.

Re: Super-spreading wedding demonstrates Covid-19 risk posed by holiday gatherings

#27

When will the daily Covid fear stories on Hacker News end? What is there to discuss here? Is there anything to discuss? What good will come of this submission? Why does Hacker News continue to have Covid fear stories on the front page every day?

If one event is cancelled because they saw this posting, then lives were potentially saved. If this is a good reminder for us to talk to our loved ones to cancel their events, then it almost certainly saved lives.

It's a low cost way to remind people that we definitely shouldn't be having Thanksgiving, Christmas, or other holiday gatherings.

Re: Super-spreading wedding demonstrates Covid-19 risk posed by holiday gatherings

#29

I wonder if we could implement some sort of cap and trade system to make everyone happy? Everyone could be rationed a certain number of gatherings per month and then each person would be free to choose how to use them. They could use one to see family during the holidays, they could go to a protest, go to a wedding, celebrate in the street, go to a movie, etc. We could even track them as discrete tokens, or "social c…

How does that help? Stay at home for as many events as you want, going to one 'super-spreading wedding' is still no bueno.

Re: Super-spreading wedding demonstrates Covid-19 risk posed by holiday gatherings

#30

We operate in the wedding niche and we have seen a drastic decline in not only the number of weddings but also the size of weddings. The impact has been significant.

I should hope so, during a pandemic.
Post reply on HN