Live data from Hacker News

Background Features in Google Meet, Powered by Web ML

ai.googleblog.com

21–30 of 276 posts

Re: Background Features in Google Meet, Powered by Web ML

#21

Unrelated to the ML, but I don't like the fact I noticed that all the people in the clips are "diverse". No clue whether Google did this on purpose, but I feel like I've been trained to notice this due to the diversity movement thing currently occurring and I don't like it.

Why don't you like it?

Re: Background Features in Google Meet, Powered by Web ML

#22

Unrelated to the ML, but I don't like the fact I noticed that all the people in the clips are "diverse". No clue whether Google did this on purpose, but I feel like I've been trained to notice this due to the diversity movement thing currently occurring and I don't like it.

In this particular case, why is testing/demonstrating on diverse set of individuals a bad thing ? A personal anecdote is that a few years back the automatic door sensors in my university did not work on my skin tone.

It's not a bad thing, I just dislike that I noticed it.

Re: Background Features in Google Meet, Powered by Web ML

#23

Unrelated to the ML, but I don't like the fact I noticed that all the people in the clips are "diverse". No clue whether Google did this on purpose, but I feel like I've been trained to notice this due to the diversity movement thing currently occurring and I don't like it.

Sorry not everyone on the planet looks like you

Re: Background Features in Google Meet, Powered by Web ML

#24
post #21

Unrelated to the ML, but I don't like the fact I noticed that all the people in the clips are "diverse". No clue whether Google did this on purpose, but I feel like I've been trained to notice this due to the diversity movement thing currently occurring and I don't like it.

Why don't you like it?

Because I don't think I would have noticed a couple of years ago.

Re: Background Features in Google Meet, Powered by Web ML

#27
post #15

Sony released some software a couple of months ago that lets you use most of their DSLRs as webcams with USB. My goodness, paired with a fast lens, what a difference to my MacBook webcam, even with these ml blurred backgrounds! It's only 720p and around 15fps but real shallow dof, very little sensor noise, autofocus works. Well worth trying if you have a Sony camera from the last few years. Sensor size and good optic…

Canon did too! Definitely a huge upgrade over a typical webcam.

I'm using my old T1i which can be had for less than $50 these days, plus you can pick up a 18-55mm kit lens for like $20 and the video quality blows away any webcam, especially for the same price. Also recommend battery->power adapter.

Re: Background Features in Google Meet, Powered by Web ML

#28
post #15

Sony released some software a couple of months ago that lets you use most of their DSLRs as webcams with USB. My goodness, paired with a fast lens, what a difference to my MacBook webcam, even with these ml blurred backgrounds! It's only 720p and around 15fps but real shallow dof, very little sensor noise, autofocus works. Well worth trying if you have a Sony camera from the last few years. Sensor size and good optic…

Canon and Nikon do too. In practice, the quality bump is nice, but we are still talking of a fairly low res/bit rate when it gets through Zoom so the end result is fairly underwhelming. As far as what the other people see on their wnd.

Re: Background Features in Google Meet, Powered by Web ML

#29
post #23

Unrelated to the ML, but I don't like the fact I noticed that all the people in the clips are "diverse". No clue whether Google did this on purpose, but I feel like I've been trained to notice this due to the diversity movement thing currently occurring and I don't like it.

Sorry not everyone on the planet looks like you

They seem to be lamenting that they now notice skin color (due to all the racial essentialism of the last N years) where they used to not notice.

Re: Background Features in Google Meet, Powered by Web ML

#30

Happy to see ML become mainstream. In the future, I don't think ML will be a separate field of programming. It'll just be "programming," the same way webdev is. There's a tendency to think of ML as "not programming," or something other than just plain programming. But as the tooling matures, that'll go away. (Lisp used to be considered "AI programming," till it became useful in many other contexts.)

I don't count web dev as programming. HN is full of JS people that think a text editor and a browser with fuck all data, load, or volume issues is 'programming'. Fucking casuals.
Post reply on HN