Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you don’t care, don’t add it to your deck. What’s that you say? You downloaded premade decks? Don’t do that! Constructing your deck yourself is an important part of the learning process.
I use anki to document and remember all my emacs custom key-bindings. That might sound silly but it's easy to accumulate useful things over the years in emacs and forget about them. Emacs is vast and deep and there's a lot to learn and remember. It also serves the same purpose for key-bindings and functions in various modes and packages.
Anki as Learning Superpower: Computer Science Edition
21–30 of 249 posts
Re: Anki as Learning Superpower: Computer Science Edition
#22Trying to learn Finish vocab, Anki made me realize I had terrible recall. Sometimes, I couldn't even remember what the last freaking card was, and I would forget most things the next day, and everything the day after. After about 3 weeks, I had only remembered 3 or 4 words, so I gave up.
Lack of motivation, some mental issue like depression, attention problem while learning. You can't learn stuff like you sweep a floor, tune out and just do the movements.
Re: Anki as Learning Superpower: Computer Science Edition
#23Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you don’t care, don’t add it to your deck. What’s that you say? You downloaded premade decks? Don’t do that! Constructing your deck yourself is an important part of the learning process.
I use anki to document and remember all my emacs custom key-bindings. That might sound silly but it's easy to accumulate useful things over the years in emacs and forget about them. Emacs is vast and deep and there's a lot to learn and remember. It also serves the same purpose for key-bindings and functions in various modes and packages.
That’s not silly at all, a lot of people use Anki for things like that. I’ve seen a couple of premade decks but I would avoid these.
When it comes to keybindings its better to make your own deck otherwise you end up learning a load of bindings you’ll never use. I like to add them as and when I need them.
Re: Anki as Learning Superpower: Computer Science Edition
#24> Anki as Learning Superpower If it's a superpower, it's at best a rote learning superpower. Can you use Anki to learn quantum field theory, and solve the lamb shift problem without looking at the existing solutions? Cut out the hyperbole please.
When you learn facts, they are easily accessible for thinking and the connections start forming even unconsciously.
The idea that you can keep the facts in a book and the brain is just like CPU that processes them is wrong. You have to remember if you want to learn complex stuff like physics.
Re: Anki as Learning Superpower: Computer Science Edition
#25Re: Anki as Learning Superpower: Computer Science Edition
#26Earlier quoted context omitted.
Probably for languages, but even still I would assert memorizing a dictionary is less informative than reading 50 books.
I think there's a false dichotomy here. Memorising a dictionary is easy , because memorisation is a choice (with spaced repetition). Reading a book in an unfamiliar language takes lots of time and mental effort. Both will contribute to your understanding of the language; perhaps memorising a dictionary contributes less, but then there's a lower activation energy involved in it too: whenever you have five minutes spar…
Re: Anki as Learning Superpower: Computer Science Edition
#27Rqr1qqqqqêeeeee
Re: Anki as Learning Superpower: Computer Science Edition
#28I went rather deep into ankification of computer science - 5500 cards deep. I've written up my experiences as a series of articles here for anyone interested https://www.jackkinsella.ie/articles/janki-method
Re: Anki as Learning Superpower: Computer Science Edition
#29Earlier quoted context omitted.
Rote learning absolutely does help with comprehension. If you understand all of the words in “ Tod mach’s mir leicht, wenn du kommst vor deiner Zeit” reading it and understanding it is trivial. If you have to look up each word individually your comprehension will at best be enormously slowed. The same principle applies if what you’re reading is a chemical formula, a logical proof or a description of a historical even…
Probably for languages, but even still I would assert memorizing a dictionary is less informative than reading 50 books.
If you're trying to learn the content of the book, the process of converting the information into flashcards entails engaging with the material, so that isn't skipped.