21–30 of 53 posts
"Pray, who is the candidate's tailor?" -Hilbert Who is responsible for OpenAI's UI/UX design? It is immaculate and should be the standard for the community. I'm always dazzled by the impeccable standards of OpenAI with regards to tone, presentation, accessibility. The documentation is both familiar but distinct, an impressive achievement! I have my own personal qualms on OpenAI's ethics and virtues but am nevertheles…
I assume this comment is generated? The link is a standard Sphinx doc.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I wonder if the fact that we now can't trust anything we read is good or bad. Maybe it'll lead to critically thinking about everything.
Could you ever?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Could you ever?
I meant in the specific sense of trusting the basic humanity of HN, not the general veracity of the internet at large.
Web of trust is inevitable either way. I just hope it won't be owned by any huge company. Most likely it will be practically shared by a few of them, like the Internet or web standards.
After playing some with GPT-3 though I noticed I work a lot of like it though. Unrelated comments about web of trust are a great example.
Also, dude, I see you in almost every comment thread, how do you consume HN? Some clever scripts or lots of tabs and lots of refreshing?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I meant in the specific sense of trusting the basic humanity of HN, not the general veracity of the internet at large.
I would want to say that comments should be judged solely on their content, but yes, "redis works for us" is a different message from an account that you know is CTO at some big corp instead of some random one. Web of trust is inevitable either way. I just hope it won't be owned by any huge company. Most likely it will be practically shared by a few of them, like the Internet or web standards. After playing some with…
It might be confirmation bias (or maybe we just like the same things), if you look at my history I only leave a few comments a day.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
If that comment is generated, I will quit my current job and work full time on AI. I don't believe it.
All the blogs posted by e.g. this user [0] were generated by GPT-3. [1] Some of those reached the top of HN. That comment indeed looks a lot like it is generated. It has correlated a bunch of words, but it did not understand that the link between UI and AI is tenuous. It is probably one of the few comments where it is so glaringly obvious. There are likely a lot more comments around which are generated but which went…
Would it be possible to use gpt3 to "beautify" existing prose without changing its meaning? Now that would be useful!
Earlier quoted context omitted.
If that comment is generated, I will quit my current job and work full time on AI. I don't believe it.
All the blogs posted by e.g. this user [0] were generated by GPT-3. [1] Some of those reached the top of HN. That comment indeed looks a lot like it is generated. It has correlated a bunch of words, but it did not understand that the link between UI and AI is tenuous. It is probably one of the few comments where it is so glaringly obvious. There are likely a lot more comments around which are generated but which went…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Do you have a source for this? Not nitpicking, i actually need it for a project...
I believe he's referring to the absurdity of this statement, especially in relation to SpinningUp (it doesn't have any UI as it's a RL library, and the docs site are generated using standard Sphinx doc generator)
I know that GPT3 is impressive, but I'm not as convinced as some of the other commenters here that it's a generated comment. If a similar comment were posted on a non-AI related post, nobody would bat an eye.
Is there an equivalent to Hanlon's razor for AI? "Don't attribute to an text generation AI, which could be adquately explained by slightly nonsensical speech".
Earlier quoted context omitted.
And now we're going to need a turing test captcha.
I'd be more worried about bots gaming the voting. I'm perfectly happy to share this website with intelligent machines if they make insightful comments. Whether odomojuli's post was written by a human, robot or dog is rather immaterial. It's the content of the post that makes it good or bad. It can be evaluated without knowing the author.
Not me. Not without total attribution so I know it's a bot and whose. There is no AI generated text etc without an agenda - implicit or explicit; benign or sinister.
Advancing the conversation is one thing but when u can't tell between a Russian GRU bot let loose to promote trigger words and some 4chan teenager who had a bad day at school then the online forum as a mode of expression is dead.
A 4channer is entitled to their opinion however wrong. A bot acting like it's human needs to be hunted, killed, and erased.