Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes, absolutely. Apologies if that's not clear from the website. GITenberg started as an experimental fork of PG, but due to the work of Eric Hellman at the Free Ebook Foundation, much of the infrastructure such as metadata formats, CI/CD for building books, and DVCS backend are being ported upstream to the Project Gutenberg infrastructure.
Thanks for the clarification!
GITenberg is an open source community for publishing ebooks in the public domain
21–30 of 43 posts
Re: GITenberg is an open source community for publishing ebooks in the public domain
#22Re: GITenberg is an open source community for publishing ebooks in the public domain
#23Re: GITenberg is an open source community for publishing ebooks in the public domain
#24Earlier quoted context omitted.
Thanks for the clarification!
OP here, I doubt that the website is "a SUBSET of Project Gutenberg". This is not mentioned anywhere in the website. As mentioned in PG website, while you can use the book freely, "The name 'Project Gutenberg' is a registered trademark.". I guess this is the reason they didn't mention PG.
I think that the GITenberg collection contains all of the books in PG. At this point, the creation of new repos is automatically done when Distributed Proofreaders creates a new book in PG. Originally, I didn't include around 400 PG books due to their creators claiming copyright, and didn't include Bruce Sterling's book because he wouldn't let me re-license it creative commons rather than his pseudo-public-domain license.
Not much has been happening with GITenberg itself in the past few years. But luckily, a lot of the concepts and code are getting upstreamed into PG. Which in my opinion, is way way better.
Re: GITenberg is an open source community for publishing ebooks in the public domain
#25What is improved by adding Git to PG?
Re: GITenberg is an open source community for publishing ebooks in the public domain
#26Earlier quoted context omitted.
[Standard Ebooks]( https://standardebooks.org/ ) has accomplished a lot in producing better ebooks of public domain texts.
OP here, it seems standardebooks doesn't provide the books in PDF format. My side project, https://www.bilinual.com rebuild the ebooks in PDF format with translation hints, if you don't mind about learning a new language while reading your favourite books ;)
Re: GITenberg is an open source community for publishing ebooks in the public domain
#27What is improved by adding Git to PG?
Re: GITenberg is an open source community for publishing ebooks in the public domain
#28Earlier quoted context omitted.
OP here, it seems standardebooks doesn't provide the books in PDF format. My side project, https://www.bilinual.com rebuild the ebooks in PDF format with translation hints, if you don't mind about learning a new language while reading your favourite books ;)
There are about 400 GITenberg books that have CC-by licensed covers provided by Recovering the Classics. If you're interested in using that art for your PDFs I can find you the index!
Re: GITenberg is an open source community for publishing ebooks in the public domain
#29Earlier quoted context omitted.
OP here, I doubt that the website is "a SUBSET of Project Gutenberg". This is not mentioned anywhere in the website. As mentioned in PG website, while you can use the book freely, "The name 'Project Gutenberg' is a registered trademark.". I guess this is the reason they didn't mention PG.
Now I remember, that was the reason I wasn't more clear about the connection to PG when I wrote the website https://github.com/gitenberg-dev/giten_site/ . Since then my co-founder Eric Hellman has been doing engineering work for Project Gutenberg, as well as running the rest of the Free Ebook Foundation, which is the parent org of GITenberg, free-programing-ebooks, and Unglue.it. I think that the GITenberg collection…
Re: GITenberg is an open source community for publishing ebooks in the public domain
#30Earlier quoted context omitted.
There are about 400 GITenberg books that have CC-by licensed covers provided by Recovering the Classics. If you're interested in using that art for your PDFs I can find you the index!
Thanks, it would be great. I am curious to know why do they have CC license and not public domain?
Public domain obviously can be ascertained, but if CC0 hasn’t been granted we rely on dated reproductions: basically a photograph of the artwork in question in a book or journal with a copyright date of 1924 or earlier.
(that’s obviously specifically a US legal reading, but SE from a legal point of view is a US project)