Live data from Hacker News

Request for Technically Risky Projects

news.ycombinator.com

21–30 of 31 posts

Re: Request for Technically Risky Projects

#21

No one seems to trust vpns. I wonder if a VPN company almost needs to be law technology. All of our attempts at privacy is technically sound but lacks the backing of solid lawyers ready to hold it down. That’s got to be worth something.

VPN's run through a company will always be subject to monitoring. I don't see a way around this other than something similar to TOR or mixnets.

Re: Request for Technically Risky Projects

#22
post #13
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Thanks, I'm aware of it. There are quite a lot of tools in this space already. Unfortunately, many are unaware of each-other and therefore making the same mistakes and learnings over and over again. Looking at all these tools makes it clear how difficult it is to create one that actually "works". Most of the researchers at the canonical debate lab created their own tool in the past and are now discussing how a next-g…

Cool. In some ways, that sounds like the software industry in a nutshell, to be honest :) Can you share a sense for what any of the core unsolved problems are? (I'd be happy to read a mailing list / previous discussions if there's too much background to be worth communicating in a comment here) I've noticed that Arguman seemed to run into community management and spam issues. More broadly speaking there seems to be a…

The core unsolved problems in my opinion are:

- The argumentation data model

- An attack/manipulation-proof community curation system (maybe similar to StackOverflow)

- A user-interface that can be used by anyone who is interested to contribute, but powerful enough to work with the argumentation structure

There is a weekly zoom meeting every monday that is recorded and uploaded to youtube: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLwMyf-sRX2_Hqw-h9ba_S...

Re: Request for Technically Risky Projects

#23

A Laser Mosquito Turret for homes, that uses a directional microphone to home in on the target.I don’t believe that it would be difficult to build the laser part, but the difficulty would be in making it safe for home use.

https://photonicsentry.com/

Isn't that a safety-hazard. The laser is probably strong enough to make you blind if it hits you wrongly in the eye.

Re: Request for Technically Risky Projects

#24

A Laser Mosquito Turret for homes, that uses a directional microphone to home in on the target.I don’t believe that it would be difficult to build the laser part, but the difficulty would be in making it safe for home use.

https://photonicsentry.com/

Awesome

Re: Request for Technically Risky Projects

#25
post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

https://photonicsentry.com/

Isn't that a safety-hazard. The laser is probably strong enough to make you blind if it hits you wrongly in the eye.

One would assume you’d endeavor to keep humans out of the kill box when the system is active.

Re: Request for Technically Risky Projects

#27
An alternative to the html model for building websites. The html model is antiquated for building web apps, and inconsistent across various browsers x platforms. The direction of the spec imo is becoming an overengineered mess that is increasingly controlled by the Google (see portals and web packages).

With the arrival of webgpu, I predict we'll begin to see end to end frameworks for building web apps that own the entire pipeline of application state management to drawing pixels on the screen.

Re: Request for Technically Risky Projects

#28
post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

https://photonicsentry.com/

Isn't that a safety-hazard. The laser is probably strong enough to make you blind if it hits you wrongly in the eye.

It's for industrial uses. There are more dangerous things, like chainsaws and microwaves. You either design it to be safer (microwave) or keep humans out of the way (chainsaw).

It sounds like parent commenter is working on the former.

Re: Request for Technically Risky Projects

#29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Apologies for the condescension, and with all due respect, building a social network is a bit neo Silicon valley frothy.

the idea of building another facebook is just...ugh. however, a friend of mine has been working on a community site for fishing enthusiasts for years. it's _extremely hard_ to bootstrap a community site of any kind, even if it's not "social networking" per se.

I think the idea is to build a not-facebook. I'm working in social media too, and there's a lot of things that FB does poorly.

The goal is usually media, centered around yourself. For some people, it could be their line of work, or happenings in their neighbourhood. FB, prioritizing growth, is like the BuzzFeed of social media, but we're starting to see why that doesn't work.

Post reply on HN