21–25 of 25 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
But it's still garbage collected. And GC should be done by the python interpreter proper, so it would be in native code.
A tiny portion of Python's total execution time.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
A tiny portion of Python's total execution time.
Don't get me wrong; I expect Go to be far more performant than Python. Just, they're both garbage-collected, and I have no reason to expect GC perf (specifically) to differ.
And the differences between value types, AOT compiled code execution, bytecode interpreters and FFI marshalling costs between bytecode interpreters and native libraries.
https://github.com/qtile/qtile/pull/1239 https://github.com/qtile/qtile/pull/1387
FWIW, I've been using qtile for several years now, switching from awesome. Nice things: - tiling WM with support for floating windows - useful widgets out of the box (CPU/mem/network graphs, clipboard notification, audio volume) - works well most of the time - highly configurable and scriptable - you can set the active group ("virtual desktop) for each screen individually, whereas awesome has virtual desktops that co…
Late reply, but this might fix it:
There's also bluetile, written in haskell http://bluetile.org