Edit: so it does! You learn something new...
GitHub is working on renaming default branch from “master”
21–30 of 280 posts
Re: GitHub is working on renaming default branch from “master”
#22Re: GitHub is working on renaming default branch from “master”
#23"main" does seem like an objectively better word to use. The definition fits better in almost every use case. May seem like a silly gesture to some, but imagine feeling an emotional trigger every time you had to use a basic tool for your job. That'd piss me off.
However, if not, it looks like a cynical publicity grab in light of recent headlines.
Re: GitHub is working on renaming default branch from “master”
#24So there is an actual problem that they could work on. Often the branch which most users should clone and use is not the bleeding edge working branch, which often is master. It would be nice if you could set the default branch for cloning for most users somehow. Edit: so it does! You learn something new...
Re: GitHub is working on renaming default branch from “master”
#25If you are going to help, actually do something that improves the lives of people. Maybe, you should really put some effort into beefing up the Computer Science programs in black high schools and colleges? You are Microsoft, and had a damn policy of only hiring people from certain schools for certain job areas. In 90, one of your damn reps told a classroom of students that they were only good for "help desk" positions because of the school they went to. I'm betting some all black colleges were not on the hire list for actual developer jobs.
Actually doing something useful is hard, this is just signalling how cool you are.
Re: GitHub is working on renaming default branch from “master”
#26So there is an actual problem that they could work on. Often the branch which most users should clone and use is not the bleeding edge working branch, which often is master. It would be nice if you could set the default branch for cloning for most users somehow. Edit: so it does! You learn something new...
Re: GitHub is working on renaming default branch from “master”
#27"main" does seem like an objectively better word to use. The definition fits better in almost every use case. May seem like a silly gesture to some, but imagine feeling an emotional trigger every time you had to use a basic tool for your job. That'd piss me off.
counterpoint: I'll be pissed off and emotionally triggered, knowing that they bent over backwards just to be "politically correct" or "progressive".
Re: GitHub is working on renaming default branch from “master”
#28I don't mind renaming it but it feels like a token action without any real weight.
Re: GitHub is working on renaming default branch from “master”
#29Honest question: are there people out there who are legitimately uncomfortable/upset about the usage of the terms "master" and "slave" in the context of technology? Or is this more so people trying to be too socially "woke" and assuming something to be offensive when it is not? Master/slave are pretty commonly used terms whenever we talk about things like distributed systems and communication buses. Essentially every…
But in this case, there's not even a slave branch.
Re: GitHub is working on renaming default branch from “master”
#30I'm a strong supporter of social justice. I don't really object to people putting in work to change language like that if they think it's important. Especially when the work required is minimal. That said, this is slightly ridiculous. Have customers seriously complained about the term "master"? And my impression was that the usage was more similar to "master copy" than "master of the plantation". Honestly, it's frust…