U.S. Army Vintage Racer Concept Suggests Hypersonic Entry For Loitering UAS
21–30 of 78 posts
Re: U.S. Army Vintage Racer Concept Suggests Hypersonic Entry For Loitering UAS
#22Re: U.S. Army Vintage Racer Concept Suggests Hypersonic Entry For Loitering UAS
#23Earlier quoted context omitted.
Presumably you can abort mission with a drone and have it return home. Not sure you can do that with a cruise missile.
the IAI Harop is a missile that can loiter, and if no target is found can Return to Base.[0] Although, admittedly, the lines between 'drone' and 'missile' have begun to blur. [0] : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IAI_Harop
Re: U.S. Army Vintage Racer Concept Suggests Hypersonic Entry For Loitering UAS
#24As I understand it, my grandfather helped to develop a suicide drone that got to its target area at hypersonic speed in the late 1950s. For the Pentagon. It was called the Minuteman ICBM, and it entered service in 1962. Is it possible to get a less misleading title on this article than "Pentagon Has Tested A Suicide Drone That Gets To Its Target Area At Hypersonic Speed"?
Re: U.S. Army Vintage Racer Concept Suggests Hypersonic Entry For Loitering UAS
#25Earlier quoted context omitted.
Presumably you can abort mission with a drone and have it return home. Not sure you can do that with a cruise missile.
the IAI Harop is a missile that can loiter, and if no target is found can Return to Base.[0] Although, admittedly, the lines between 'drone' and 'missile' have begun to blur. [0] : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IAI_Harop
Re: U.S. Army Vintage Racer Concept Suggests Hypersonic Entry For Loitering UAS
#26As I understand it, my grandfather helped to develop a suicide drone that got to its target area at hypersonic speed in the late 1950s. For the Pentagon. It was called the Minuteman ICBM, and it entered service in 1962. Is it possible to get a less misleading title on this article than "Pentagon Has Tested A Suicide Drone That Gets To Its Target Area At Hypersonic Speed"?
It would be misleading to call an ICBM a drone.
Re: U.S. Army Vintage Racer Concept Suggests Hypersonic Entry For Loitering UAS
#27As I understand it, my grandfather helped to develop a suicide drone that got to its target area at hypersonic speed in the late 1950s. For the Pentagon. It was called the Minuteman ICBM, and it entered service in 1962. Is it possible to get a less misleading title on this article than "Pentagon Has Tested A Suicide Drone That Gets To Its Target Area At Hypersonic Speed"?
It would be misleading to call an ICBM a drone.
Re: U.S. Army Vintage Racer Concept Suggests Hypersonic Entry For Loitering UAS
#28Earlier quoted context omitted.
No, because it can loiter in the air for up to 2 hours in the target area before destroying its target.
Supposedly nuclear powered missiles (if they really exist) can cruise for days
Re: U.S. Army Vintage Racer Concept Suggests Hypersonic Entry For Loitering UAS
#29As I understand it, my grandfather helped to develop a suicide drone that got to its target area at hypersonic speed in the late 1950s. For the Pentagon. It was called the Minuteman ICBM, and it entered service in 1962. Is it possible to get a less misleading title on this article than "Pentagon Has Tested A Suicide Drone That Gets To Its Target Area At Hypersonic Speed"?
Re: U.S. Army Vintage Racer Concept Suggests Hypersonic Entry For Loitering UAS
#30As I understand it, my grandfather helped to develop a suicide drone that got to its target area at hypersonic speed in the late 1950s. For the Pentagon. It was called the Minuteman ICBM, and it entered service in 1962. Is it possible to get a less misleading title on this article than "Pentagon Has Tested A Suicide Drone That Gets To Its Target Area At Hypersonic Speed"?