Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you have reason to believe that the information is doctored, it would be a better idea to explain why. Attacking the messenger is fine for scoring points in a debate, but it isn't going to bring anything valuable to the discussion. We should be thinking about the people who are confused and scared right now, not Siemens and their bottom line.
He did explain why.
Because the guy made an incorrect assumption before he had the proper data, or something else? Most people did that, it's obviously not an unfixable problem. Also, can't we just ask some guy who was working at the plant if there is a third stage? How does this guy know that it hasn't been upgraded?