Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not your keys, not your coins™ -- with that as the core philosophy of cryptocurrency, can you even say this was stolen, let alone laundered? It sounds like the person with the keys transferred the coins into another wallet. Resolved: behaves correctly. At least, as intended anyways.
I don't think there is anything fundamental about cryptocurrency that would make them entirely immune to theft. You can both believe that the blockchain is working as intended and that the coins were stolen.
$14M in ETH stolen from Upbit were laundered in May through well-known exchanges
21–30 of 96 posts
Re: $14M in ETH stolen from Upbit were laundered in May through well-known exchanges
#22This is an interesting piece, and it highlights one problem I’ve noticed with crypto in general recently, which is that these kinds of investigations are largely being carried out by private entities who build platforms around this type of forensics without any real ability to go after the exchanges that have permitted this laundering. Between this and Bitfinex refusing to submit to an external auditor and other even…
Ten years ago the refrain was "Bitcoin is anonymous". These days exchanges and even cash-based ATMs want your identifying info. Ten years from now, every flow of value will be bound to a real world identity. If we're lucky, the coins that do have untraceability will survive.
Re: $14M in ETH stolen from Upbit were laundered in May through well-known exchanges
#23Earlier quoted context omitted.
it is like saying in the 90s: we don't need open protocols like pop3/imap, because AOL is centralized anyway (fast forward today: yes, most people still use centralized gmail/outlook.com, but I still have a) the choice to host my mails and b) lower cost to build a service that compete with the big ones, as I don't need to part of the big-players to plug-in to the open "email-system") In "crypto" centralized" companie…
Although that 'open email system' isn't as open in practice, since most of the big providers aren't going to accept your email if you set up your own sender.
Re: $14M in ETH stolen from Upbit were laundered in May through well-known exchanges
#24This is an interesting piece, and it highlights one problem I’ve noticed with crypto in general recently, which is that these kinds of investigations are largely being carried out by private entities who build platforms around this type of forensics without any real ability to go after the exchanges that have permitted this laundering. Between this and Bitfinex refusing to submit to an external auditor and other even…
The whole point was to have an open system where you dont place trust in or ask permission of someone to use. That still holds up in this scenario.
Re: $14M in ETH stolen from Upbit were laundered in May through well-known exchanges
#25Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think you've hit on the core reason cryptocurrencies aren't going to take off as currencies. They've taken the governance aspect previously enacted by the federal reserve and enforced through the banks and replaced it with a shadowy cabal of exchange owners. Ultimately I think it's a people problem that can't be solved through technology. But cryptocurrency does happen to be quite useful for money laundering...
Decentralized exchanges exist for the more sophisticated cryptos (e.g. Ethereum).
Re: $14M in ETH stolen from Upbit were laundered in May through well-known exchanges
#26Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't think there is anything fundamental about cryptocurrency that would make them entirely immune to theft. You can both believe that the blockchain is working as intended and that the coins were stolen.
I don't disagree although the system philosophically, at it's core, has no concept of theft, of permission, or reversal. Keys = coins.
Exactly... and if you steal the keys, you are stealing the coins.
Re: $14M in ETH stolen from Upbit were laundered in May through well-known exchanges
#27Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't disagree although the system philosophically, at it's core, has no concept of theft, of permission, or reversal. Keys = coins.
> Keys = coins Exactly... and if you steal the keys, you are stealing the coins.
Re: $14M in ETH stolen from Upbit were laundered in May through well-known exchanges
#28Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think you've hit on the core reason cryptocurrencies aren't going to take off as currencies. They've taken the governance aspect previously enacted by the federal reserve and enforced through the banks and replaced it with a shadowy cabal of exchange owners. Ultimately I think it's a people problem that can't be solved through technology. But cryptocurrency does happen to be quite useful for money laundering...
Decentralized exchanges exist for the more sophisticated cryptos (e.g. Ethereum).
Re: $14M in ETH stolen from Upbit were laundered in May through well-known exchanges
#29This is an interesting piece, and it highlights one problem I’ve noticed with crypto in general recently, which is that these kinds of investigations are largely being carried out by private entities who build platforms around this type of forensics without any real ability to go after the exchanges that have permitted this laundering. Between this and Bitfinex refusing to submit to an external auditor and other even…
>Wasn’t that whole point of these coins to begin with? The whole point was to have an open system where you dont place trust in or ask permission of someone to use. That still holds up in this scenario.
Re: $14M in ETH stolen from Upbit were laundered in May through well-known exchanges
#30This is an interesting piece, and it highlights one problem I’ve noticed with crypto in general recently, which is that these kinds of investigations are largely being carried out by private entities who build platforms around this type of forensics without any real ability to go after the exchanges that have permitted this laundering. Between this and Bitfinex refusing to submit to an external auditor and other even…