Couldn’t this actually be useful in countries that block Wikipedia?
And if you decide to work around that by setting up more domains to do this, then you could just as well use those domains to front regular proxy servers.
21–30 of 48 posts
Couldn’t this actually be useful in countries that block Wikipedia?
And if you decide to work around that by setting up more domains to do this, then you could just as well use those domains to front regular proxy servers.
I propose we design a markup language so this can be parsed. How about DTML? And maybe some styling rules as well, we can call it DSS. And we can't forget a basic scripting language called DJS.
I'll start working on the parser, we can call it a drowser.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I wouldn't say it's the opposite. It sounds the opposite from the title, but this actually returns Wikipedia content. The other one fetches a link to a site.
I just meant opposite in the most trivial sense: (reverse '("Wikipedia" "over" "DNS")) => ("DNS" "over" "Wikipedia")
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I just meant opposite in the most trivial sense: (reverse '("Wikipedia" "over" "DNS")) => ("DNS" "over" "Wikipedia")
finally my lisp class has aided me in a real-life scenario
Great start, but plain text in 2020? I propose we design a markup language so this can be parsed. How about DTML? And maybe some styling rules as well, we can call it DSS. And we can't forget a basic scripting language called DJS. I'll start working on the parser, we can call it a drowser.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
finally my lisp class has aided me in a real-life scenario
I never had a lisp class, so I'm sitting here wondering why there is one single quote.
What that means is 'don't try to evaluate this as a function call'.
Basically it's a data list.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
finally my lisp class has aided me in a real-life scenario
I never had a lisp class, so I'm sitting here wondering why there is one single quote.
Couldn’t this actually be useful in countries that block Wikipedia?