The author of this article has internalized some Keynesian assumptions so deeply that he doesn't realize the story he is writing directly falsifies one of them. A major assumption of Keynesian economics is that employment scales with production. Thus, if you stimulate aggregate demand, you will increase production, and thereby increase employment. This hasn't happened - aggregate demand and production have recovered,…
aggregate demand has recovered Wow. Ok, I lean left and you lean right so obviously we're going to differ on some things. But, conceptually, you'd think those things would all be values-related things. In this case what you're saying conflicts with my mental model of the world. The basic "reality" that I live in. I don't have a point to make, just expressing how weird it is to me to see someone write that.
Here is data on production: http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/GDP http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/INDPRO
Here is employment: http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/PAYEMS
See the disconnect?
Lets focus specifically on Durable Goods, since we have a decent measure of their demand (not just their production). The recovery here is incomplete, but it's we are about halfway from trough to peak.
Durable goods demand: http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/DGORDER
Durable goods production: http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/IPDCONGD
Durable goods employment: http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/DMANEMP
It doesn't surprise me that what I'm saying conflicts with your model of the world. It conflicts with my old model, and nukes my favorite possible solution (tax cuts) as well. But the data is the data, and all we can do is try to build new models which fit it.
The economy has changed, and our old models don't work very well anymore. We need new models.