Live data from Hacker News

Apollo 11 Guidance Computer source code for the command and lunar modules

github.com

21–30 of 33 posts

Re: Apollo 11 Guidance Computer source code for the command and lunar modules

#23

Title is incorrect, this has been available for quite a while

We've fixed the title. Submitters: please use the original title, unless it is misleading or linkbait. This is in the site guidelines at https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html.

(Submitted title was "Entire Apollo 11 Guidance Computer Source Code is now in the public domain")

Re: Apollo 11 Guidance Computer source code for the command and lunar modules

#24
Discussed in 2009: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=715395

2012: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3888638

2014: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8063192

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7522539

2016: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12048945

Smaller threads from a year ago:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19014278

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18737380

Re: Apollo 11 Guidance Computer source code for the command and lunar modules

#26
post #2

Wow, was "burn baby burn" really part of the original source code?! https://github.com/chrislgarry/Apollo-11/blob/master/Luminar...

The whole line is not as shocking # BURN, BABY, BURN -- MASTER IGNITION ROUTINE

It makes sense in context, of course, I just didn't think of NASA in the late 60ies as the sort of place where you could write 'clever' things like that.

Re: Apollo 11 Guidance Computer source code for the command and lunar modules

#28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>NUMERO MYSTERIOSO https://github.com/chrislgarry/Apollo-11/blob/master/Luminar...

People frequently seem to think this is about the line number it's on (666), but that doesn't have anything to do with it. That line number is a totally modern construction; the original source code was on punch cards. That particular comment was punched onto card number 0562 in the LUNAR LANDING GUIDANCE EQUATIONS log section. The original developers only referred to code by punch card number, and page number in the…

One heck of a coincidence.

Re: Apollo 11 Guidance Computer source code for the command and lunar modules

#29
post #19

Didn’t this get released a couple years ago? Or was that a different ship?

I have the same question, and in addition I'm confused why this repository seems to have been created by some random GitHub user.

He was an employee at NASA several years ago.

Re: Apollo 11 Guidance Computer source code for the command and lunar modules

#30
post #29
post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have the same question, and in addition I'm confused why this repository seems to have been created by some random GitHub user.

He was an employee at NASA several years ago.

That makes some sense. Thanks.
Post reply on HN