Live data from Hacker News

Which Emoji Scissors Close?

wh0.github.io

21–30 of 131 posts

Re: Which Emoji Scissors Close?

#21
post #11

I realize this opinion is likely to be unpopular, but this industry wastes so much time and energy on such irrelevant things.

Is the entire entertainment industry a waste of time? Some people create things for their own and other's enjoyment even though it has no "practical" use.

Re: Which Emoji Scissors Close?

#22
post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Interesting how almost everyone goes for a 4-4-0 style train with the American-style balloon smokestack. It's funny that this is called "wild west" because it's rather anachronistic for that design. In the 1870s and onward, railroads are buying 4-6-0 trains instead of 4-4-0 trains. And the balloon shape is a feature of wood-burning locomotives (which produce a lot more embers and sparks than coal does). The Great Pla…

I know very little about the 1800s outside of European warfare. Was railway technology really advancing so rapidly in the United States that missing the mark by a mere 20 years and a few hundred miles counts as an anachronism?

I don't know a lot about trains in particular, but mechanical technology was advancing very rapidly during this period. It's roughly when the mass production of interchangeable machine parts started to take off. Singer (sewing machines) and Colt (revolvers) are two notable examples.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_system_of_manufacturi...

Re: Which Emoji Scissors Close?

#23
post #9

I really enjoyed this. It is very similar to "Please, enough with the dead butterflies!" [0] I'd like to see a list of everything like this. Similar to Awesome falsehood [1] but not quite. 0: https://emilydamstra.com/news/please-enough-dead-butterflies... ( HN 1: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14460013 HN 2: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21788356 ) 1: https://github.com/kdeldycke/awesome-falsehood

Yes!!! I live for these completely pointless obsessions into a topic.

Re: Which Emoji Scissors Close?

#24
post #9

I really enjoyed this. It is very similar to "Please, enough with the dead butterflies!" [0] I'd like to see a list of everything like this. Similar to Awesome falsehood [1] but not quite. 0: https://emilydamstra.com/news/please-enough-dead-butterflies... ( HN 1: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14460013 HN 2: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21788356 ) 1: https://github.com/kdeldycke/awesome-falsehood

Yes!!! I live for these completely pointless obsessions into a topic.

Profile checks out. todays.pointless.click looks good :D I started https://furious.engineering/ to add random stuff, but so far there's only one which shows the spanish equivalent of 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th.

I think these ones could be added to awesome-falsehoods. I'd love a list that was more centered on this idea, but for now awesome-falsehoods would probably be the best place for it. Maybe a design or visual category?

Re: Which Emoji Scissors Close?

#25
post #15
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Different groups working on different projects, lack of communication and global company vision or even internal competition leads to wasting money producing the same thing multiple times. Basically the "Not Invented Here" syndrome, at the company level.

You could actually end up wasting more money if you get "alignment". Thats why things take a shit ton of time for the most part.

Move fast and duplicate things.

Re: Which Emoji Scissors Close?

#28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes!!! I live for these completely pointless obsessions into a topic.

Profile checks out. todays.pointless.click looks good :D I started https://furious.engineering/ to add random stuff, but so far there's only one which shows the spanish equivalent of 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th. I think these ones could be added to awesome-falsehoods. I'd love a list that was more centered on this idea, but for now awesome-falsehoods would probably be the best place for it. Maybe a design or visual category?

I had hoped that the internet, beyond the 90s, would be a place where almost everyone has a webpage like ours populated with whatever it is the individual decided was noteworthy.

To an extent it's come true in a small subset. But discovery is the hard part. Right now discovery leads you to social media pages full of, for the most part, a low budget substitute for air.

Post reply on HN