Earlier quoted context omitted.
While this is a helpful point, I think it would be nice if this issue were framed more in terms of physical and mental health, not just as a question of how to optimise economic output. We need less cars for almost every possible reason you can think of.
I want to make a point. There should be no concern that The War on Cars harms the economy of New York City. It is a claim without evidence.
Could New York City Eliminate Free Street Parking?
21–30 of 47 posts
Re: Could New York City Eliminate Free Street Parking?
#22In New York owning a car is a huge luxury, the city is giving away free real estate to the richest of the rich New Yorkers. Getting rid of free street parking is a great idea.
Re: Could New York City Eliminate Free Street Parking?
#23A must read classing for anyone interested in this topic: The High Cost of Free Parking by Donald Shoup https://www.amazon.com/High-Cost-Free-Parking-Updated/dp/193...
What makes this a must read?
Re: Could New York City Eliminate Free Street Parking?
#24> Driving down any avenue, the traffic lanes have been diminished because of the bicycle lanes and the parking areas have been diminished because of the bike rentals. It’s punishing drivers. Funny how drivers are willing to blame everyone except other cars. Walk down Canal or Broome around rush hour and it's pretty clear that the problem is not bike lanes (neither have them) but the fact that there are just too many…
This might be an unfair generalization, but I associate pro-car sentiments with older conservative voters, who unfortunately do turn out to elections more strongly. The outer burroughs certainly elect in that direction.
Re: Could New York City Eliminate Free Street Parking?
#25>> "In Chicago, neighborhood parking costs residents $25 a year; in Los Angeles, as much as $34; in Washington, $35; and in Portland, Ore., $75. In Boston, a pass for neighborhood parking is free, but officials are considering charging people with one car $25, and more for second and third cars." The area highlighted in the article is the Upper West Side in Manhattan, which is a primarily residential area and not a c…
Nobody who lives on the Upper West Side is driving to work. They circle looking for spots when they have to move their cars for street cleaning and when the get back Sunday night from their country houses. https://nyc.streetsblog.org/2019/07/05/new-york-is-really-aw...
Re: Could New York City Eliminate Free Street Parking?
#26Re: Could New York City Eliminate Free Street Parking?
#27In New York owning a car is a huge luxury, the city is giving away free real estate to the richest of the rich New Yorkers. Getting rid of free street parking is a great idea.
You must not visit Queens, Bronx or Manhattan beyond 110 very often. They have extensive car ownership. I don't think anyone would call them rich.
That said, I agree with OP's comment within the context of Manhattan. Anyone who owns a car there is very wealthy, even within the context of a wealthy city.
(I don't agree with pegging the divide at 110th street, that's much too low.)
Re: Could New York City Eliminate Free Street Parking?
#28In New York owning a car is a huge luxury, the city is giving away free real estate to the richest of the rich New Yorkers. Getting rid of free street parking is a great idea.
62% of households in Queens and 44% of households in Brooklyn own a vehicle [0]. [0] https://edc.nyc/article/new-yorkers-and-their-cars
https://www.governing.com/gov-data/car-ownership-numbers-of-...
Re: Could New York City Eliminate Free Street Parking?
#29In New York owning a car is a huge luxury, the city is giving away free real estate to the richest of the rich New Yorkers. Getting rid of free street parking is a great idea.
You must not visit Queens, Bronx or Manhattan beyond 110 very often. They have extensive car ownership. I don't think anyone would call them rich.
Re: Could New York City Eliminate Free Street Parking?
#30In New York owning a car is a huge luxury, the city is giving away free real estate to the richest of the rich New Yorkers. Getting rid of free street parking is a great idea.
Charging is not going to fix that problem. If anything, the closer you get to charging market rates, the less accessible it becomes to anyone other than the richest of the rich. At least with free parking all vehicle owners are on an equal footing regardless of how much disposable income they have. Not that I'm advocating free parking. I'm not. But this isn't a good argument against it.