Live data from Hacker News

Privacy: Is That iPhone?

foundation.mozilla.org

21–30 of 188 posts

Re: Privacy: Is That iPhone?

#21

Finding the settings mentioned in the article is the sole dark pattern I can think of in iOS — when you find them it’s like finding a secret level in Super Mario Land. They are under Settings...Privacy...Advertising https://imgur.com/a/EOvUzCS The Advertising and Analytics options are only visible below the fold, if one scrolls down the privacy page. The fold itself is disguised as the bottom of the page to put you o…

Did you… print out a screenshot of your phone?!

[deleted]

Re: Privacy: Is That iPhone?

#23

Finding the settings mentioned in the article is the sole dark pattern I can think of in iOS — when you find them it’s like finding a secret level in Super Mario Land. They are under Settings...Privacy...Advertising https://imgur.com/a/EOvUzCS The Advertising and Analytics options are only visible below the fold, if one scrolls down the privacy page. The fold itself is disguised as the bottom of the page to put you o…

Do you really think it's a dark pattern? What does Apple have to gain?

Why do they have this as the default setting if they have nothing to gain from it?

Re: Privacy: Is That iPhone?

#24

Finding the settings mentioned in the article is the sole dark pattern I can think of in iOS — when you find them it’s like finding a secret level in Super Mario Land. They are under Settings...Privacy...Advertising https://imgur.com/a/EOvUzCS The Advertising and Analytics options are only visible below the fold, if one scrolls down the privacy page. The fold itself is disguised as the bottom of the page to put you o…

Do you really think it's a dark pattern? What does Apple have to gain?

I have no idea but I would guess that it’s something quite banal.

They could, for example, sign a deal with an ad network that gives them beneficial rates on the condition that Apple show there is less than 1% churn in device IDFAs per month. Hiding the IDFA reset button would help with that.

It could also quite easily be some PM’s H2 goal to move the needle on IDFA retention. If they provably impact IDFA resets and they get an exceeds expectations rating in that performance review cycle! Bonus stock options all round! Tech companies are weird like that.

I’ve commented before accusing Apple of using growth and engagement tactics with iOS’s Mail.app, presumably to improve mean-time-before-replying-to-grandma metrics, so color me conspiracy theorist / jaded about Silicon Valley performance metrics.

Re: Privacy: Is That iPhone?

#25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Did you… print out a screenshot of your phone?!

I applied filters and took a screenshot of the screenshot to reduce image fidelity in case it contained any [covertly embedded]* identifying information [in the form of watermarks or hidden pixels] . *added for clarity.

What are trying to protect against? A screenshot of a screenshot with a filter applied to it isn’t going to help you if your name shows up somewhere in it.

Re: Privacy: Is That iPhone?

#26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I applied filters and took a screenshot of the screenshot to reduce image fidelity in case it contained any [covertly embedded]* identifying information [in the form of watermarks or hidden pixels] . *added for clarity.

What are trying to protect against? A screenshot of a screenshot with a filter applied to it isn’t going to help you if your name shows up somewhere in it.

Tracking watermarks / pixels.

Re: Privacy: Is That iPhone?

#27
post #8

OK, so, probably an ignorant question, but here I go anyway: What, exactly, does "turning off IDFA" do? Does it send just a dummy IDFA? Or does it give you nothing at all? Why is rotating it periodically better? (I'm assuming rotation is better because that is what Mozilla is apparently recommending.)

"When Limit Ad Tracking is enabled on iOS 10 or later, the Advertising Identifier is replaced with a non-unique value of all zeros to prevent the serving of targeted ads. It is automatically reset to a new random identifier if you disable Limit Ad Tracking."

From: https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT205223

Re: Privacy: Is That iPhone?

#28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Do you really think it's a dark pattern? What does Apple have to gain?

Why do they have this as the default setting if they have nothing to gain from it?

Hilariously, this tracking id is the replacement of device id. To give the user more privacy. But Mozilla has an axe to grind. Baking up the wrong tree

Re: Privacy: Is That iPhone?

#29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Did you… print out a screenshot of your phone?!

I applied filters and took a screenshot of the screenshot to reduce image fidelity in case it contained any [covertly embedded]* identifying information [in the form of watermarks or hidden pixels] . *added for clarity.

I get the filters, but why the second screenshot? Aren't you just adding more hypothetical tracking pixels with that step?

Re: Privacy: Is That iPhone?

#30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I applied filters and took a screenshot of the screenshot to reduce image fidelity in case it contained any [covertly embedded]* identifying information [in the form of watermarks or hidden pixels] . *added for clarity.

I get the filters, but why the second screenshot? Aren't you just adding more hypothetical tracking pixels with that step?

So that the final screenshot is from outside the app being screenshotted, and as a bonus you get another round of JPEG obfuscation.
Post reply on HN