Live data from Hacker News

Borrowers Are Going Underwater on Car Loans

wsj.com

21–30 of 32 posts

Re: Borrowers Are Going Underwater on Car Loans

#21
Car loans are a relatively small component of overall consumer debt in the U.S.[1]

By far, the largest amount of money tied up in debt is in mortgages. The highest number of borrowers are credit card users.

Underwater car loans are a problem for some borrowers, maybe, and could portend a slowdown in car buying, but people have many options when it comes to cars. They'll buy used, if they hit a debt wall and simply can't afford new, then later trade up for a new vehicle.

It's unlikely that this is a sign of recession, in my opinion.

1. https://www.lendingtree.com/debt-consolidation/consumer-debt...

Re: Borrowers Are Going Underwater on Car Loans

#22

This is a weird summary because everyone who buys a car on credit is always “underwater”. The cars are never worth the balance of the loan. People buy cars on credit not because the car has intrinsic value or is an investment, but because it gives them access to other things of value, like their job. I’m concerned, of course, that Americans have built a society with so few buses that everyone has to buy a car on cred…

I've never checked but I don't think I've ever been underwater on a car loan - I finance but not 100% of the price - it's more like 50% - whatever the value of the trade plus at least a little bit of cash that I bring to the table. That said I tend to agree that "underwater" isn't really the right concept for a car loan. Unless of course you total a car right after you get it. Sucks to be putting $ towards a car note…

That’s just time-shifting. You paid in opportunity cost to move those payments backwards in time. This may have been rational for you, since it lowers the risk of the loan I.e. you can always walk away from such a loan when it is backed by a sufficiently valuable asset. But this doesn’t change the fundamental equation.

Re: Borrowers Are Going Underwater on Car Loans

#23
Americans make terrible decisions with cars.

The article includes two anecdotal examples. I suspect that my income exceeds both. I would never pay as much as they did for a car. Cars are terrible investments. Most should be purchased as the bare minimum cost to get back and forth to work.

I particularly dislike the common refrain, "the cost to repair it is more than the car is worth." It's the wrong mindset. The repair cost is always far less than the replacement cost. My old 150k beater that needs $1k of repairs every year is still much less expensive than the $25k+ it would cost to replace. I have no car payment (thus no interest), and property taxes are cheaper.

And people keep buying brand new cars. Why? Our culture doesn't properly identify brand new cars as luxury items. We should publish a new rule of thumb. Nobody should be buying new cars who can't already afford to fund an IRA.

Re: Borrowers Are Going Underwater on Car Loans

#24
post #3

I'm underwater on my car loan. But my credit rating was low and I got to get a new car without anything down, extended payments. The interest rate is a bit high, but now my credit score is good. It works out. At least I got a car that will last as long as the loan.

Cars last a long time now. My car is 20 years old and it’s still far cheaper to maintain that car than to buy a new car.

Depends where you live - 20 years of salt nets you a frame that will break if you sneeze

Re: Borrowers Are Going Underwater on Car Loans

#25
post #20

This is a weird summary because everyone who buys a car on credit is always “underwater”. The cars are never worth the balance of the loan. People buy cars on credit not because the car has intrinsic value or is an investment, but because it gives them access to other things of value, like their job. I’m concerned, of course, that Americans have built a society with so few buses that everyone has to buy a car on cred…

> I’m concerned, of course, that Americans have built a society with so few buses that everyone has to buy a car on credit. But being “underwater” is not the main problem here. More specifically, we've built cities that are pretty awful for bus (or rail) transportation, if you thrown any sane amount of money at the public transit system. Most of our cities have been relying on inefficient (i.e. very spread-out, low-d…

Buses are a relatively decent solution for a city lacking in public transportation infrastructure. For example, Phoenix (where I live) has a network of north-south and east-west buses that can get you, eventually, to anywhere in the valley (Uber/Lyft can fill in the gaps). I normally drive, like 4 million others, but several times I've taken the light rail from Sky Harbor to midtown, then a couple of buses to my destination many miles north of the airport, and I was impressed by how easy it is--and how underutilized.

Perhaps we can mitigate many of our urban problems--pollution & greenhouse gases, road congestion & traffic accidents, and consumer debt--by investing in electric or NG buses.

Re: Borrowers Are Going Underwater on Car Loans

#26
If you read the traffic on /r/askcarsales, the salesman all point to Chrysler/Jeep/Dodge/Ram as the last refuge of the credit-unworthy.

FCA will take much riskier clients (and much more negative equity) than other makers, even though their product depreciates way faster than almost every other brand on the market.

Re: Borrowers Are Going Underwater on Car Loans

#27

This is a weird summary because everyone who buys a car on credit is always “underwater”. The cars are never worth the balance of the loan. People buy cars on credit not because the car has intrinsic value or is an investment, but because it gives them access to other things of value, like their job. I’m concerned, of course, that Americans have built a society with so few buses that everyone has to buy a car on cred…

>everyone who buys a car on credit is always “underwater”. The cars are never worth the balance of the loan

In my early years I once took out a loan for a car. I've never once been underwater on my loan. You're only underwater at some point if you put down a small/no down payment and pay the minimum amount due every month.

The topic of this article is people rolling the balance of their previous car loan into their new car loan. So they are underwater before they drive it off the lot, sometimes by a LOT. That's scary! Its basically running on a treadmill that always accelerates.

Re: Borrowers Are Going Underwater on Car Loans

#29
Two friends wanted to by a cheaper car, so their loan is now 66K?

Looks like WSJ is skirting around the issue of subprime loans made to rideshare (Uber/Lyft) drivers. lost track of the number of unhappy uber/lyft drivers I have chatted, because of the predatory nature of the incentives and car loans.

The drivers think they bought a new Camry, and while making a nice profit in the first few months. Then the incentives dry up, while principle due has barely moved. Now the predatory lender has a captive slave to make the monthly payment by giving ride, because there's a loss aversion mindset that prevents the driver from walking away.

At some point though, the drivers will realize it's not worth slaving it out for a car they don't own. With Uber losses continuing to pile up, at some point incentives will go to zero, their retention costs will go up, drivers will get fewer $$$ per mile.

If this happens on a large scale, there has to be some kind of a crisis with these subprime loans. There'll be glut of used cars, killing new car sales, thus affecting those car manufacturers/sales.

Re: Borrowers Are Going Underwater on Car Loans

#30
post #25
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I’m concerned, of course, that Americans have built a society with so few buses that everyone has to buy a car on credit. But being “underwater” is not the main problem here. More specifically, we've built cities that are pretty awful for bus (or rail) transportation, if you thrown any sane amount of money at the public transit system. Most of our cities have been relying on inefficient (i.e. very spread-out, low-d…

Buses are a relatively decent solution for a city lacking in public transportation infrastructure. For example, Phoenix (where I live) has a network of north-south and east-west buses that can get you, eventually, to anywhere in the valley (Uber/Lyft can fill in the gaps). I normally drive, like 4 million others, but several times I've taken the light rail from Sky Harbor to midtown, then a couple of buses to my dest…

“Eventually” is the problem. I have a 35-minute commute if I wait out rush hour, but it's two hours by bus. Each way. If I get lucky with both transfers. Average speed: 11 MPH.
Post reply on HN